Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 17;12:841980. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.841980

Table 7.

Clinical outcomes of IGABT reported in studies.

Study IGABT technique No. of patients OS LC
Pötter et al. (7) MRI 156 68% (3-year) 95% (3-year)
Charra-Brunaud et al. (8) CT/MRI (group 3, 3D arm) 117 74% (2-year) 78.5% (2-year)
Lindegaard et al. (6) MRI (group MR-IGABT) 140 79% (3-year) 91% (3-year)
Nomden et al. (25) MRI 46 65% (3-year) 93% (3-year)
Rijkmans et al. (5) CT/MRIa (group IGABT) 83 86% (3-year)
Sturdza et al. (28) CT/MRIb 731 65% (5-year) 89% (5-year)
Kamran et al. (27) MRI (group MR-IGABT) 29 84% (2-year) 96% (2-year)
van Dyk et al. (17) MRI/USc 191 63% (5-year) 86% (5-year)
Horeweg et al. (29) CT/MRId 155 65.9% (5-year) 90.4% (5-year)
Wu et al. (18) CT/MRI 49 90% (2-year) 90% (2-year)
Horne et al. (26) MRI 239 72.7% (5-year) 90.8% (5-year)
Gill et al. (30) CT/MRIe 128 85% (2-year) 92% (2-year)
Present study MRI 97 83.5% (2-year) 94.8% (2-year)
a

In group IGABT, 48.2% of patients underwent MRI scanning for all fractions, 38.6% of patients underwent MRI and CT for different fractions, and 13.3% of patients underwent only CT. Pelvic recurrence was found in 7% at 3 years for the MR-IGABT group.

b

In this study, 80.9% of patients underwent MR-IGABT for at least one fraction and for 19.1% of patients, only CT was used.

c

All patients underwent MRI and transabdominal ultrasound imaging with applicators in situ at the first brachytherapy fraction and ultrasound imaging alone at subsequent fractions.

d

In this study, 72.3% MRI scanning was used for all fractions, 23.9% of patients underwent MRI and CT for different fractions, and 3.9% of patients underwent only CT.

e

All patients underwent MR-IGABT for at least one fraction.