Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 16;5(1):e31820. doi: 10.2196/31820

Table 2.

Comparison of the reading level scores calculated by 8 readability scales of patient education materials (PEMs) from the Atlantic Pediatric Society (APS) with 2 other pediatric associations' PEMs.

Readability test P value across all PEMs P value for the pairwise comparison of the APSa PEMsb to other pediatric associations' PEMsc


Caring for Kids Pediatric Endocrine Group
CLId <.001 <.001 <.001
NDCe <.001 <.001 .02
DRP-GEf <.001 <.001 <.001
FKg <.001 <.001 .001
FORCASTh <.001 <.001 <.001
GFi <.001 <.001 <.001
NFCj .08 .38 .13
SMOGk <.001 .003 <.001

aAPS: Atlantic Pediatric Society.

bPEM: patient education material.

cP values for comparisons across the different pediatric associations’ PEMs were calculated using analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a Welch correction nonparametric equivalent when applicable. P values for pairwise comparisons between PEMs were calculated using the Tukey, Tamhane, and Dunnett test.

dCLI: Coleman-Liau index.

eNDC: New Dale-Chall readability formula.

fDRP-GE: Degrees of Reading Power–grade equivalent test.

gFK: Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level.

hFORCAST: Ford, Caylor, Sticht scale.

iGF: Gunning Fog index.

jNFC: New Fog Count.

kSMOG: Simple Measure of Gobbledygook index.