Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 17;10:851850. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.851850

TABLE 1.

Comparison of technological differences between bioimpedance and bioreactance.

Bioreactance Bioimpedance
Assumptions regarding blood flow Related to change in body’s resistance, capacitance, and inductance Related to the change in body’s resistance only
Anatomical assumption regarding thorax Thorax is an electrical circuit with resistor and capacitor Fluid-filled cylinder or truncated cone
SV estimation Calculated from phase shift, determined from resistance and capacitance [amplitude magnitude of impedance and phase direction of impedance (Z0)] Calculated from estimated changes in resistance/impedance (Z0) – electrical current flow over time due to aortic blood flow changes
SV calculation Peak rate of change of the phase shift (dφ/dtmax) is proportional to the peak aortic flow from which SV is calculated (eq. 2) Instantaneous rate of change in Z0 is related to aortic blood flow and SV is proportional to the maximal rate of change of Z0 (dZ0/dtmax) and the ventricular ejection time (VET)
Electrode placement Applied at the base of the neck (thoracic inlet) and costal margins (thoracic outlet) on both sides.
Measurements are sensitive to electrode placement
2 pairs of dual-electrode sensors – placed on the left thorax and right neck
Measurements stated not to be sensitive to placement
VET determination VET is determined by BR (first and second zero crossing of the dφ/dt signal) and electrocardiographic signals (peak of the QRS complex) VET is determined by the distance between QRS complexes

Modified from Jakovljevic et al., (17) dZ0/dt, impedance change over time; VET, ventricular ejection time; Z0, impedance; dφ/dtmax, peak rate of change od change of phase shift.