Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 30;12(3):e057132. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057132

Table 1.

Summary of research articles included in this systemic review and meta-analysis of infertility (n=32)

No Authors Study area Study design Sample size Female infertility Quality assessment (%)
1 Aggarwal et al, 201336 India Cross-sectional 500 267 87.5
2 Albayrak and Günay, 200723 Kayseri, Turkey Cross-sectional 300 150 87.5
3 Biringer et al, 201533 North Trondelag, Sweden Cross-sectional 12 584 1696 100
4 Klemetti et al, 20109 Finlad Cross-sectional 2291 239 100
5 Bakhtiyar et al, 201918 Lorestan, Iran Case control 720 180 70
6 Alhassan et al, 201440 Ghana Cross-sectional 100 100 87.5
7 Alosaimi et al, 201542 Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Cross-sectional 406 206 100
8 Matsubaya et al, 200143 Tokai, Japan Cross-sectional 182 101 87.5
9 Açmaz et al, 201324 Kayseri, Turkey Cross-sectional 133 86 87.5
10 Bai et al, 201944 Ningxia province, China Cross-sectional 740 380 100
11 Bazarganipour et al, 201319 Kashan, Iran Cross-sectional 300 238 100
12 Begum and Hasan, 201446 Karachi, Pakistan Cross-sectional 120 60 87.5
13 Volgsten et al, 200835 Sweden Cross-sectional 825 122 88.9
14 Bringhenti et al, 199727 Italy Cross-sectional 179 122 87.5
15 Lansakara and Wickramasinghe, 201137 Colombo, Sri Lanka Cross-sectional 354 177 87.5
16 Noorbala et al, 200920 Tehran, Iran Cross-sectional 300 150 87.5
17 Salih Joelsson et al, 201734 Sweden Cross-sectional 3583 468 100
18 Aydin et al, 201525 Istanbul, Turkey Cross-sectional 88 88 87.5
19 Tarlatzis et al, 199347 Greece Cohort 87 69 81.8
20 Ramezan et al, 200421 Tehran, Iran Cross-sectional 370 370 87.5
21 Aarts et al, 201138 Netherlands Cross-sectional 472 472 87.5
22 Baldur et al, 201339 Denmark Cohort 98 320 44 773 100
23 Diamond et al, 201731 United states Cross-sectional 1594 1594 87.5
24 Downey and McKinney, 199230 New York City Case control 201 118 80
25 Fassino et al, 200228 Italy Case control 172 172 90
26 Guz et al, 200326 Turkey Case control 100 50 80
27 Omani et al, 201722 Tehran, Iran Cross-sectional 312 149 100
28 Salomão et al, 201832 Brazil Case control 280 140 80
29 Sbaragli et al, 200829 Siena, Italy Case control 302 82 100
30 Akalewold et al, 202241 Ethiopia Cross-sectional 409 66 100
31 Kleanthi et al, 202148 Greece Case control 177 90
32 Peng et al, 202145 China Case control 450 100

The quality assessment was performed based on the Joanna Briggs Institute Meta-Analysis for cross-sectional, case–control and cohort studies.