Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 29;11(3):20584601221085514. doi: 10.1177/20584601221085514

Table 1.

Basic characteristics of the studies.

Author Year Country Type of study Type of TCAE Treatment No. of patients Median age Sex (M/F) Score (NOS)
Ueno 10 2009 Japan RCS cTACE RFA 10 68 10/0 6
TACE 13 72 8/5
Qkuwaki 11 2009 Japan RCS cTACE RFA 30 69 16/14 6
TACE 19 65 12/7
Koh 12 2016 China RCS cTACE RFA 42 63 32/10 8
TACE 60 57 51/9
Chen 13 2016 China RCS cTACE RFA 32 NA 28/4 9
TACE 78 NA 71/7
Kim 14 2017 Korea RCS cTACE RFA 6 50 5/1 6
TACE 21 57.1 20/1
Joliat 15 2017 Switzerland RCS NA RFA 18 64 13/5 7
TACE 16 67 14/2
Wang 16 2020 China RCS cTACE
DEB-TACE
RFA 47 60.6 34/13 8
TACE 32 61 28/4
Kim 17 2020 Korea RCS NA RFA 171 56 137/34 7
TACE 230 56 187/43
Wang 18 2015 China PCS NA RFA 162 52.7 148/14 8
TACE 339 51 301/38

RCS, retrospective cohort study; PCS, prospective cohort study; NA, not applicable; NOS, Newcastle-Ottawa scale; RFA, radiofrequency ablation; TACE, transarterial chemoembolization, cTACE, conventional TACE; DEB-TACE, drug-eluting bead TACE.