Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 31;12:10. doi: 10.1186/s40945-022-00133-6

Table 1.

Reliability of the PEDro scale assessed in the whole sample of trials

PEDro score ICC (95% C.I.) SEM
0.639 (0.566–0.701) 0.795
% agreement k interpretation P +  +  Sa Sd
PEDro scale item
 2 Random allocation 95.0 .01 none to slight 94.6 0.99 0.03
 3 Concealed allocation 91.6 .71 substantial 13.1 -0.71 0.00
 4 Groups similar at baseline 69.5 .36 fair 45.0 0.29 0.02
 5 Subject blinding 93.0 .65 substantial 7.7 -0.83 0.03
 6 Therapist blinding 97.3 .59 moderate 2.0 -0.96 0.00
 7 Assessor blinding 88.6 .65 substantial 15.1 -0.66 0.04
 8 Less than 15% dropouts 64.8 .30 fair 36.6 0.13 -0.20
 9 Intention-to-treat analysis 59.7 .15 none to slight 17.1 -0.43 -0.21
 10 Between-group statistical comparisons 87.9 .39 fair 82.9 0.88 0.07
 11 Point measures and variability data 92.6 .55 moderate 87.2 0.88 0.01
Quality discriminationa 73.5 .41 moderate 21.1 -0.42 -0.05

aBased on PEDro cut score = 6 (see main text for details)

ICC Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, CI confidence intervals, SEM Standard Error of the Measurement, P +  + agreement on the presence of the item, Sa symmetry expressions for agreement, Sd symmetry expressions for disagreement