Individuals |
End users or consumers engaged in potentially problematic risk-taking behaviors |
Ownership of ultimate decision about the extent of engagement in a behavior |
Due consideration of information provided from a variety of sources concerning potential risks |
Use of available tools to aid self-regulation and minimize exposure to potential harms |
Families |
Parents/caregivers of children/adolescents engaged in potentially problematic risk-taking behaviors |
Education about risks and communicating these to family members |
Setting guidelines around use of emerging technologies and assisting to abide by these |
Decisions about providing funds and assistance with managing finances for engagement with emerging technologies |
Monitoring of behavior and risk markers |
Role modeling of how to engage with technology to enhance well-being |
Community |
Frontline groups (e.g., teachers, police, and advocacy organizations) that have contact with individuals engaged in potentially problematic risk-taking behaviors |
Education and awareness of the potential risks to individuals’ health and well-being, and ways in which technology use may cause harm to others, particularly vulnerable populations (e.g., online exploitation of children) |
Promoting methods to establish healthy and sustainable patterns of engagement |
Developing and implementing education campaigns and prevention strategies to be used by community members |
Reporting of emerging patterns and trends in behaviors observed |
Treatment and welfare providers |
Non-specialist and specialist clinicians who provide treatment and support services to individuals engaged in potentially problematic risk-taking behaviors |
Identification and detection of emerging problematic behaviors amongst vulnerable populations |
Provision of treatment and support services through the development of effective, evidence-based therapeutic modalities for individuals engaging in problematic risk-taking behaviors, especially if there are co-occurring mental disorders |
Researchers |
Academics and scientists from a range of disciplines (e.g., psychology, psychiatry, behavioral economics, neuropsychology, public health, media and communications, and sociology) whose work relates to problematic risk-taking involving emerging technologies |
Investigating the true nature and scope of emerging issues |
Informing and evaluating policy and treatment approaches |
Working with all stakeholders to design and conduct methodologically rigorous, independent research |
Translating research findings and theoretical developments to guide policies and strategies to enhance well-being and minimize harms |
Industry |
Any organizations profiting, either directly or indirectly, from technologies and products involved with problematic behaviors, including product developers, distributors, advertisers, broadcasters, and trade associations |
Public recognition of potential for technologies to be used in ways that lead to harms |
Clear user guidelines on appropriate and inappropriate use of technologies and behaviors that may lead to harms |
Development, implementation, and evaluation of harm-minimization strategies (e.g., in-app tools and resources) appropriate to potential risks |
Detection of emerging problematic behaviors through identification of consumers exhibiting risky patterns of behavior (e.g., by predictive modeling) for potential preventative action or intervention, including referral to treatment and support services as appropriate |
Demand reduction: e.g., increasing product prices and provision of alternative options |
Accountability, transparency, and willingness to collaborate with other stakeholder groups in response to emerging problematic behaviors relating to their products |
Governments |
Government bodies responsible for policy and regulation relating to problematic risk-taking involving emerging technologies (e.g., gambling regulators) |
Public recognition of risky behaviors resulting in harms from use of emerging technologies |
Facilitation of prevention strategies and treatment services, including provision of funding to appropriate stakeholders |
Development of classification strategies to reduce access to inappropriate technologies or products by minors |
Supply reduction through development, implementation, monitoring, and evaluation of policies for limiting the availability of content and activities that have the potential for problem development |
Demand reduction: e.g., through increased taxation of particular products |
Creating a regulatory environment in which industry can proactively disclose potentially problematic behaviors detected without fear of negative consequences to allow investigation and promote early intervention |