Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 17;12:861078. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.861078

Table 1.

Concordance between conventional testing and NGS.

Variable IDH1 R132H (IHC) ATRX loss (IHC) 1p/19q codeletion (FISH) CDKN2A/B loss (FISH) TERT promoter mutation (Sanger) EGFR amplification (FISH) Chr7 imbalance (FISH) Chr10 loss (FISH) TP53 mutation (IHC)
by CT N° samples analysed 60 60 10 18 45 39 33 33 59
Positive for both 7 3 5 5 33 4 19 20 15
Positive for CT and Negative for NGS 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 3
Positive for NGS and Negative for CT 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
Positive for neither 52 56 5 13 12 34 14 13 39
Cohen’s k 0.923 0.848 1 1 1 0.874 1 1 0.800
Sensitivity for CT, % 87.50 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 88.24
Specificity for CT, % 100.00 98.25 100.00 100.00 100.00 97.14 100.00 100.00 92.86
Sensitivity for NGS, % 100.00 75.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 80.00 100.00 100.00 83.33
Specificity for NGS, % 98.11 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 95.12

CT, conventional testing; NGS, next generation sequencing; IHC, immunohistochemistry; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization.