Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 8;13(2):455–473. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmab121

TABLE 1.

Characteristics of studies included in a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of soy products on cardiovascular risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes1

 Trial duration, wk Intervention
Author, year Age, y Mean BMI (kg/m2) Treatment Isoflavone
(ref) Country Study design Sample, n (M/F) IG CG IG CG group Soy dose dose Control
Anderson et al., 1998 (49) USA Crossover (R) 8 MIG: 8 MCG: 8 M 8 64.0 ± 26.0 35.1 ± 6.2 Soy protein NR NR Animal protein
Jayagopal et al., 2002 (50) UK Crossover (R/DB) 32 FIG: 32 FCG: 32 F 12 62.5 ± 6.8 32.2 ± 5.0 Soy protein + isoflavone 30 g 132 mg Placebo (cellulose)
Azadbakht et al., 2003 (51) Iran Crossover (R) 14 (10 M/4 F)IG: 14 (10 M/4 F)CG: 14 (10 M/4 F) 7 62.5 ± 12.1 26.6 ± 4.0 Soy protein 0.8 g/kg NR Animal protein
Teixiera et al., 2004 (52) USA Crossover (R) 14 MIG: 14 MCG: 14 M 8 NR NR 29.8 ± 0.8 29.8 ± 0.8 Soy protein 0.5 g/kg 0.2 mg/g protein Casein
González et al., 2007 (53) UK Crossover (R/DB/PC) 24 MIG: 24 MCG: 24 M 4 NR NR 30.7 ± 5.5 31.0 ± 6.4 Isoflavone 25 g 132 mg Placebo (cellulose)
Noroozi et al., 2008 (54) Iran Parallel (R) 32 (4 M/28 F)IG: 16 (M/F: NR)CG: 16 (M/F: NR) 4 48.7 ± 7.5 46.2 ± 7.4 30.8 ± 4.1 32.7 ± 5.2 Soy protein + low-calorie diet 30 g 45 mg Low-calorie diet
Azadbakht et al., 2008 (30) Iran Parallel (R) 41 (18 M/23 F)IG: 20 (M/F: NR)CG: 21 (M/F: NR) 208(4 y) 62.1 ± 12.1 62.1 ± 12.1 NR NR Isoflavone 17 g 48 mg Animal protein
Chang et al., 2008 (27) Korea Parallel (R) 20 (8 M/ 12 F)IG: 10 (4 M/6 F)CG: 10 (4 M/6 F) 4 56.6 ± 2.9 54.9 ± 2.4 25.2 ± 1.1 24.3 ± 0.6 Soybean + a diabetes diet 69 g NR Diabetes diet
Pipe et al., 2009 (26) Canada Crossover (R/DB) 29 (16 M/13 F)IG: 29 (16 M/13 F)CG: 29 (16 M/13 F) 4 60.1 ± 9.6 29.6 ± 9.0 Soy protein 40 g 88 mg Milk protein
Azadbakht and Esmaillzadeh, 2009 (55) Iran Crossover (R) 14 (10 M/4 F)IG: 14 (10 M/4 F)CG: 14 (10 M/4 F) 7 62.5 ± 12.1 NR Soy protein 17.8 g NR Animal protein
Liu et al., 2010 (58) China Parallel (R/DB) 120 FIG: 60 FCG: 60 F 24 56.4 ± 4.7 55.9 ± 3.8 24.1 ± 3.8 24.6 ± 3.4 Soy protein 15 g 100 mg Milk protein
Gobert et al., 2010 (57) Canada Crossover (R/DB) 29 (16 M/13 F)IG: 29 (16 M/13 F)CG: 29 (16 M/13 F) 4 60.1 ± 9.6 29.6 ± 9.0 Soy protein 40 g 88 mg Milk protein
Ble-Castillo et al., 2010 (56) Mexico Crossover (R) 28 (2 M/24 F)IG: 28 (2 M/24 F)CG: 28 (2 M/24 F) 4 51.7 ± 5.6 34.9 ± 2.3 Soy milk 24 g 24 g Native banana starch
Miraghajani et al., 2012 (59) Iran Crossover (R) 25 (10 M/15 F)IG: 25 (10 M/15 F)CG: 25 (10 M/15 F) 4 51.0 ± 10.0 28.6 ± 4.0 Soy milk 240 cc NR Cow milk
Miraghajani et al., 2013 (60) Iran Crossover (R) 25 (10 M/15 F)IG: 25 (10 M/15 F)CG: 25 (10 M/15 F) 4 51.0 ± 10.0 28.6 ± 4.0 Soy milk 240 cc NR Cow milk
Salari Moghaddam et al., 2014 (61) Iran Crossover (R) 30 FIG:30 FCG: 30 F 6 45.7 ± 3.8 45.7 ± 3.8 28.6 ± 3.6 30.2 ± 4.3 Soybean flour–enriched bread 120 g NR Bread
Salari Moghaddam et al., 2014 (62) Iran Crossover (R) 30 FIG: 30 FCG: 30 F 6 45.7 ± 3.8 45.7 ± 3.8 28.6 ± 3.6 30.2 ± 4.3 Soybean flour–enriched bread 120 g NR Bread
Sathyapalan et al., 2016 (63) UK Parallel (R/DB) 200 MIG: 100 MCG: 100 M 12 52.0 ± 5.0 52.0 ± 5.0 31.8 ± 5.9 31.6 ± 5.8 Soy protein + isoflavone 15 g 66 mg Soy protein
Hematdar et al., 2018 (64) Iran Parallel (R) 44 (11 M/33 F)IG: 21 (7 M/14 F)CG: 23 (4 M/19 F) 8 57.0 ± 7.3 56.0 ± 7.3 25.6 ± 3.9 26.7 ± 2.9 Soybean 40 g NR 2 servings of red meat 3 days per week
Sedaghat et al., 2019 (67) Iran Parallel (R) 68 (31 M/35 F)IG: 34 (16 M/19 F)CG: 34 (15 M/19 F) 8 49.9 ± 9.2 50.2 ± 8.3 29 ± 3.2 28.2 ± 3.3 Soybean 60 g NR Usual diet
Hassanzadeh-Rostami et al., 2019 (65) Iran Parallel (R) 44 (12 M/32 F)IG: 21 (7 M/14 F)CG: 23 (5 M/19 F) 8 57.1 ± 7.3 56.1 ± 7.2 25.7 ± 3.9 26.5 ± 3.2 Soybean ×2 servings–cooked soybeans NR 2 servings of red meat 3 days per week
Konya et al., 2019 (66) Qatar Parallel (R/DB) 26 (18 M/8 F)IG: 13 (11 M/12 F)CG: 13 (7 M/6 F) 8 63.5 ± 6.3 66.8 ± 8.4 31.0 ± 5.6 30.9 ± 4.5 Soy protein + isoflavone 15 g 32 mg Soy protein
1

Some data are reported for the overall sample and not by intervention or control group. Values for age and BMI are presented as mean ± SDs. CG, control group; DB, double-blinded; IG, intervention group; NR, not reported; PC, placebo controlled; R, random; ref, reference.