TABLE 1.
High vs. low intake | Dose–response (1-serving/d increase) | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dairy product | Risk estimates (n) | Participants (n) | Cases (n)2 | Pooled RR (95% CI) | I 2 (%) | Risk estimates (n) | Participants (n) | Cases (n)2 | Pooled RR (95% CI) | I 2 (%) | Quality of evidence3 |
Total dairy | 23 | 414,148 | >136,025 | 0.91 (0.86, 0.95) | 73.5 | 19 | 314,954 | >120,254 | 0.96 (0.94, 0.97) | 66.5 | Moderate |
High-fat dairy | 11 | 103,307 | >25,232 | 0.99 (0.94, 1.05) | 84.2 | 7 | 35,767 | >10,091 | 0.98 (0.95, 1.00) | 11.8 | Low |
Low-fat dairy | 11 | 103,307 | >25,232 | 0.88 (0.80, 0.96) | 58.9 | 7 | 38,012 | >11,075 | 0.95 (0.92, 0.98) | 57.6 | Low |
Milk | 13 | 340,403 | >118,481 | 0.94 (0.90, 0.97) | 77.6 | 7 | 121,507 | 34,524 | 0.96 (0.90, 1.02) | 78.0 | Low |
Cheese | 9 | 264,514 | >95,066 | 0.97 (0.94, 1.01) | 41.8 | 6 | 50,502 | 12,702 | 1.00 (0.96, 1.04) | 54.0 | Very low |
Yogurt | 10 | 263,473 | >102,792 | 0.95 (0.90, 1.00) | 65.6 | 8 | 232,435 | 94,100 | 0.95 (0.89, 1.02) | 84.7 | Low |
Pooled relative risks are from random-effects meta-analyses. I2 refers to the proportion of heterogeneity between studies.
Number of cases not available in Beydoun et al. (31), Engberink et al. (67), and Johansson et al. (70).
The quality of evidence was graded according to the NutriGrade scoring system.