Table 2.
Class-incremental action recognition performance on UCF and HMDB datasets.
| Methods | Exemplar | UCF101 | HMDB51 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 × 5 stages | 5 × 10 stages | 2 × 25 stages | 5 × 5 stages | 1 × 25 stages | ||
| UCIR [53] | 5 | 74.31 | 70.42 | 63.22 | 44.90 | 37.04 |
| PODNet [54] | 5 | 73.26 | 71.58 | 70.28 | 44.32 | 38.76 |
| TCD [7] | 5 | 74.89 | 73.43 | 72.19 | 45.34 | 40.07 |
| 3Stream + cD | 5 | 80.65 | 78.33 | 76.84 | 52.35 | 45.63 |
| 3tream + cD + tfD | 5 | 83.24 | 81.24 | 79.2 | 54.28 | 47.15 |
| 3Stream-D | 0 | 69.34 | 64.32 | 59.86 | 45.23 | — |
| 3Stream + cD | 0 | 74.23 | 69.51 | 67.12 | 48.2 | — |
| 3tream + cD + tfD | 0 | 77.05 | 74.12 | 72.07 | 50.75 | — |