Table 3.
Results of different algorithms for detection of glass surface interference images in GRI dataset (black font indicates the best data, underlined font indicates second best).
| Algorithms | Target occlusion | Water drop | Stains | Blurry | Average | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acc(%) | IoU | Acc(%) | IoU | Acc(%) | IoU | Acc(%) | IoU | Acc(%) | IoU | |
| Deep face | 84.36 | 0.78 | 82.71 | 0.82 | 83.95 | 0.79 | 81.49 | 0.81 | 83.13 | 0.80 |
| VGG face | 88.54 | 0.79 | 85.62 | 0.75 | 81.37 | 0.73 | 82.05 | 0.78 | 84.40 | 0.76 |
| TBE-CNN | 90.71 | 0.90 | 87.38 | 0.86 | 85.29 | 0.82 | 83.72 | 0.85 | 86.78 | 0.86 |
| DA-GAN | 93.52 | 0.84 | 91.26 | 0.85 | 87.48 | 0.83 | 89.41 | 0.81 | 90.42 | 0.83 |
| PEN-3D | 86.74 | 0.88 | 85.29 | 0.92 | 82.74 | 0.87 | 83.18 | 0.86 | 84.49 | 0.88 |
| LMZMPM | 94.15 | 0.87 | 89.47 | 0.91 | 91.83 | 0.86 | 90.62 | 0.89 | 91.52 | 0.88 |
| Ours | 94.31 | 0.89 | 92.42 | 0.91 | 91.71 | 0.90 | 92.27 | 0.91 | 92.68 | 0.90 |