Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb;84(1):185–199. doi: 10.18999/nagjms.84.1.185

Table 2.

The progressions of pelvic tilt, cup anteversion and cup inclination before and after bilateral total hip arthroplasties

Pre. 2 m. 6 m. 1 y. 2 y. 4 y. 6 y. 8 y. 12 y.
Pelvic
Tilt
Sup. 30.6 22.5 16.2 8.9 10.2 11.0 10.0 10.4 8.6
Stand 33.3 15.7 10.7 10.6 12.4 4.5 6.5 3.7 3.8
Pelvic
Angle
Sup. –1.6 9.6 8.8 14.4 13.2 14.3 12.2 14.3 14.5
Stand –7.2 14.5 14.4 17.8 11.7 20.7 17.3 20.0 18.7
Cup
Antev.
Sup. - 7.6
/9.4
11.6
/18.6
12.7
/24.4
15.2
/22.1
17.7
/17.6
14.7
/21.6
13.8
/23.0
15.7
/22.1
Stand - 14.9
/14.5
16.9
/21.1
13.6
/23.6
16.1
/23.9
20.6
/22.8
18.3
/20.9
20.0
/26.3
20.8
/24.2
Cup
Inclin.
Sup. - 40.0
/55.8
42.1
/56.8
42.4
/59.5
43.1
/59.0
42.5
/58.8
42.1
/59.0
43.4
/59.3
43.2
/59.2
Stand - 41.0
/58.0
42.6
/58.8
43.0
/59.4
43.4
/59.2
43.1
/60.2
43.0
/60.0
43.7
/59.7
43.3
/60.7

This table is shown in the manner of right/left. All numbers are in degrees.

Pelvic Tilt was estimated by Muir’s nomogram. This indicates the angle of the anterior pelvic plane relative to a vertical axis, positive for anterior tilt. Pelvic Angle was calculated by Konishi’s formula. This indicates the amount of change from the average pelvic tilt, positive for posterior tilt.

Pre.: pre-operation

m.: month

y.: year

Sup.: supine

Antev.: anteversion

Inclin.: inclination