Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb;84(1):111–119. doi: 10.18999/nagjms.84.1.111

Table 3.

Regression analysis for all cases (n = 61)

r value r2value Correlation (95% CI) p value
Prostate D90-PI,
Prostate D90-post
0.09 0.006 None (–0.26_0.48) 0.54
Prostate V100-PI,
Prostate V100-post
0.18 0.034 None (–0.22_1.35) 0.16
Prostate V150-PI,
Prostate V150-post
0.57 0.33 Significant correlation (0.31_0.69) <0.001
Urethral D90-PI,
Urethral D90-post
0.58 0.33 Significant correlation (0.34_0.82) <0.001
Urethral D10-PI,
Urethral D10-post
0.69 0.47 Significant correlation (0.62_1.10) <0.001
Urethral D5-PI,
Urethral D5-post
0.54 0.3 Significant correlation (0.54_1.16) <0.001
RV100-PI,
RV100-post
0.28 0.08 None (0.06_0.75) 0.02
RD2-PI,
RD2-post
0.54 0.3 Significant correlation (0.29_0.67) <0.001

PI: prostate implantation

RV100: Rectal V100

RD2: Rectal D2