Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 31;12:5494. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09293-8

Table 2.

Classification performance of the proposed DSwarm-Net model on three benchmark HAR datasets. Acc: Accuracy, F1: F1-Score.

Encoding Used UTD MHAD NTU RGB+D 60 HDM05
Cross-subject Cross-view
Acc (%) F1 (%) Acc (%) F1 (%) Acc (%) F1 (%) Acc (%) F1 (%)
Distance encoded 95.62 96 84.49 85 87.24 88 88.45 89
Angle encoded 96.81 97 84.92 85 88.39 89 89.17 89
Distance velocity encoded 90.23 91 83.44 84 87.15 88 88.34 89
Angle velocity encoded 94.55 95 84.63 85 88.15 89 89.09 90
Compact distance encoded 97.56 98 84.81 85 88.92 89 89.46 90
Compact angle encoded 97.97 98 84.97 85 88.66 88 89.88 90
DSwarm-Net 98.13 98 85.45 86 89.98 90 90.67 92