TABLE 2.
Reported adverse effects after anodal, cathodal, and sham HD-tDCS stimulation.
| Anodal | Cathodal | Sham | ANOVA | |
| Headache | 0.32 ± 0.16 | 0.72 ± 0.32 | 0.63 ± 0.37 | F2,46 = 0.64, p = 0.504, |
| Neck pain | 0.08 ± 0.08 | 0.36 ± 0.18 | 0.13 ± 0.09 | F2,46 = 1.33, p = 0.274, |
| Scalp pain | 1.56 ± 0.39 | 1.44 ± 0.41 | 1.50 ± 0.33 | F2,46 = 0.32, p = 0.718, |
| Tingling | 2.92 ± 0.46 | 3.24 ± 0.49 | 2.96 ± 0.59 | F2,46 = 0.35, p = 0.658, |
| Itching | 3.24 ± 0.61 | 3.80 ± 0.59 | 2.63 ± 0.59 | F2,46 = 2.71, p = 0.082, |
| Burning sensation | 0.44 ± 0.19 | 1.88 ± 0.50 | 0.88 ± 0.44 | F2,46 = 5.41, p = 0.010, |
| Skin redness | 0.16 ± 0.11 | 0.68 ± 0.33 | 0.50 ± 0.30 | F2,46 = 0.66, p = 0.462, |
| Sleepiness | 2.84 ± 0.40 | 2.16 ± 0.37 | 2.92 ± 0.42 | F2,46 = 2.49, p = 0.107, |
| Trouble concentrating | 2.24 ± 0.38 | 2.24 ± 0.49 | 2.13 ± 0.51 | F2,46 = 0.01, p = 0.978, |
| Acute mood changes | 0.44 ± 0.22 | 0.68 ± 0.34 | 0.67 ± 0.36 | F2,46 = 0.22, p = 0.733, |
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistics were obtained by applying one-way repeated measures ANOVA with one factor of “Type” (anodal, cathodal, and sham HD-tDCS).