Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 14;24(3):178–189. doi: 10.1089/dia.2021.0319

Table 2.

Glycemic Outcomes During the Run-in Period and Study Phase

  Overall (n = 157)
Adolescents (n = 39)
Adults (n = 118)
Run-ina Studyb P Run-ina Studyb P Run-ina Studyb P
A1C, %c 7.5 ± 0.8 7.0 ± 0.5 <0.001d 7.6 ± 0.8 7.1 ± 0.6 <0.001d 7.5 ± 0.9 7.0 ± 0.5 <0.001d
24-h day
 Time in closed loop, % 94.9 ± 5.4 93.8 ± 5.7 95.2 ± 5.2
  TBR <50 mg/dL 0.5 ± 0.7 0.3 ± 0.4 0.003d 0.6 ± 0.7 0.4 ± 0.5 0.252d 0.5 ± 0.7 0.3 ± 0.4 0.006d
  TBR <54 mg/dL 0.8 ± 1.1 0.5 ± 0.6 0.001d 0.9 ± 1.0 0.6 ± 0.6 0.106d 0.8 ± 1.1 0.5 ± 0.6 0.005d
  TBR <70 mg/dL 3.3 ± 2.9 2.3 ± 1.7 <0.001d 3.3 ± 2.7 2.4 ± 1.8 0.021 3.4 ± 3.0 2.3 ± 1.7 <0.001d
  TIR 70–180 mg/dL 68.8 ± 10.5 74.5 ± 6.9 <0.001d 62.4 ± 9.9 72.7 ± 5.6 <0.001 70.9 ± 9.8 75.1 ± 7.3 <0.001
  TAR >180 mg/dL 27.9 ± 11.0 23.1 ± 7.2 <0.001d 34.3 ± 10.7 24.9 ± 5.7 <0.001 25.7 ± 10.2 22.6 ± 7.5 <0.001
  TAR >250 mg/dL 6.2 ± 4.7 4.6 ± 3.0 <0.001d 9.1 ± 5.4 5.6 ± 2.7 <0.001 5.3 ± 4.1 4.3 ± 3.0 <0.001d
  TAR >300 mg/dL 1.7 ± 1.9 1.2 ± 1.1 <0.001d 2.6 ± 2.4 1.5 ± 1.1 <0.001d 1.4 ± 1.5 1.1 ± 1.1 0.047d
Daytime (6 AM–12 AM)
 Time in closed loop, % 94.8 ± 5.4 93.8 ± 5.9 95.2 ± 5.2
  TBR <50 mg/dL 0.5 ± 0.7 0.3 ± 0.5 0.042d 0.5 ± 0.7 0.4 ± 0.5 0.342d 0.5 ± 0.7 0.3 ± 0.5 0.073d
  TBR <54 mg/dL 0.8 ± 1.0 0.5 ± 0.6 0.007d 0.8 ± 1.0 0.6 ± 0.7 0.175d 0.8 ± 1.1 0.5 ± 0.6 0.020d
  TBR <70 mg/dL 3.4 ± 3.0 2.4 ± 1.9 <0.001d 3.2 ± 2.7 2.5 ± 1.8 0.041 3.4 ± 3.1 2.4 ± 1.9 <0.001d
  TIR 70–180 mg/dL 68.0 ± 10.8 72.1 ± 7.7 <0.001d 60.9 ± 10.4 69.8 ± 6.3 <0.001d 70.3 ± 9.9 72.9 ± 8.0 <0.001
  TAR >180 mg/dL 28.6 ± 11.5 25.4 ± 8.1 <0.001d 35.8 ± 11.5 27.7 ± 6.8 <0.001 26.2 ± 10.5 24.6 ± 8.4 0.006
  TAR >250 mg/dL 6.6 ± 5.2 5.3 ± 3.6 <0.001d 10.0 ± 6.0 6.4 ± 3.3 <0.001d 5.5 ± 4.4 4.9 ± 3.6 0.073d
  TAR >300 mg/dL 1.8 ± 2.1 1.4 ± 1.4 0.002d 2.9 ± 2.7 1.7 ± 1.3 <0.001d 1.5 ± 1.8 1.3 ± 1.4 0.242d
Nighttime (12 AM–6 AM)
 Time in closed loop, % 94.9 ± 5.4 94.1 ± 5.5 95.1 ± 5.4
  TBR <50 mg/dL 0.6 ± 1.0 0.3 ± 0.5 0.017d 0.7 ± 0.9 0.4 ± 0.6 0.195d 0.5 ± 1.0 0.3 ± 0.4 0.050d
  TBR <54 mg/dL 0.9 ± 1.4 0.5 ± 0.7 0.006d 1.0 ± 1.4 0.6 ± 0.8 0.194d 0.8 ± 1.4 0.5 ± 0.6 0.017d
  TBR <70 mg/dL 3.2 ± 3.5 2.0 ± 2.0 <0.001d 3.4 ± 3.7 2.2 ± 2.3 0.032 3.2 ± 3.5 2.0 ± 1.8 <0.001d
  TIR 70–180 mg/dL 71.2 ± 13.6 81.5 ± 9.5 <0.001d 66.8 ± 12.8 81.1 ± 9.1 <0.001 72.6 ± 13.6 81.7 ± 9.7 <0.001
  TAR >180 mg/dL 25.6 ± 13.6 16.4 ± 9.2 <0.001d 29.9 ± 13.0 16.7 ± 8.4 <0.001 24.2 ± 13.6 16.4 ± 9.5 <0.001
  TAR >250 mg/dL 5.1 ± 5.1 2.6 ± 2.6 <0.001d 6.5 ± 5.4 3.2 ± 2.9 <0.001d 4.7 ± 4.9 2.5 ± 2.4 <0.001d
  TAR >300 mg/dL 1.2 ± 2.0 0.7 ± 0.8 0.003d 1.7 ± 2.6 0.8 ± 1.0 0.114d 1.1 ± 1.7 0.6 ± 0.8 0.012d

All values are shown as mean ± SD.

Run-in CGM was ∼14 days and study phase was ∼90 days.

During baseline run-in period, Auto Correction bolus was inadvertently delivered on six systems.

a

Sensor-augmented/integrated pump, PLGM, or Auto Basal use.

b

Auto Basal+Auto Correction use.

c

Number of participants whose data comprised A1C analysis: N = 155 for overall, n = 38 for adolescents, and n = 117 for adults.

d

Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

CGM, continuous glucose monitoring; PLGM, predictive low glucose management; TAR, time spent above target glucose range; TBR, time spent below target glucose range; TIR, time spent in target glucose range.