Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 31;5(3):e225484. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.5484

Table 3. Difference-in-Differences Estimate for the Association of High Telemedicine Adoption With Rates of Acute, Chronic, and Aggregate ACSC Visits per 1000 Patients per Yeara.

Tertile of telehealth use Visits per 1000 patients per year Difference in differences (95% CI)b
Prepandemic period (June to September 2019) Postpandemic period (June to September 2020) Difference
All ACSC visitsc
Low (reference) 24.30 14.93 −9.37 NA
Medium 23.94 15.26 −8.68 0.69 (−0.93 to 2.31)
High 27.48 20.21 −7.28 2.10 (0.22 to 3.97)
Acute ACSC composite
Low (reference) 16.28 10.48 −5.79 NA
Medium 15.91 10.63 −5.27 0.52 (−0.85 to 1.89)
High 17.90 12.98 −4.92 0.87 (−0.50 to 2.24)
Chronic ACSC composite
Low (reference) 8.57 4.67 −3.90 NA
Medium 8.55 4.86 −3.69 0.21 (−0.64 to 1.07)
High 10.14 7.44 −2.69 1.21 (−0.22 to 2.64)

Abbreviations: ACSC, ambulatory care–sensitive condition; NA, not applicable.

a

Data are from an analysis of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan claims for 2019 to 2020.

b

Estimated using average marginal effects.

c

Ambulatory care–sensitive condition visits per 1000 patients per year estimated using estimated margins.