Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 18;13:862394. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.862394

Table 1.

Histopathological scores for myocardial necrosis among different experimental groups.

Myocardial fiber swelling and interstitial edema Disorganization of myocardial fiber with or without fibroblastic proliferation Perinuclear vacuolization or myocardial fiber vacuolization Myocardial fibers myocytolysis/necrosis Total severity score
Control 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00
DM 0.78 ± 0.14* 0.89 ± 0.08* 0.83 ± 0.09* 0.94 ± 0.06* 3.44 ± 0.17*
DM+Dapa 0.44 ± 0.13*# 0.66 ± 0.11*# 0.50 ± 0.12*# 0.50 ± 0.13*# 2.06 ± 0.37*#
DM+Lira 0.28 ± 0.10*# 0.45 ± 0.12*# 0.39 ± 0.12*# 0.33 ± 0.11*# 1.44 ± 0.38*#
DM+Dapa+Lira 0.06 ± 0.03# 0.23 ± 0.10# 0.28 ± 0.11# 0.17 ± 0.09# 0.78 ± 0.21#

Tissue pathological changes within each slide were inspected and scored in three high-power fields based on severity and extent of myocardial injury. A semiquantitative scoring from 0 to 3 or more was used, with no damage = 0 and severe damage = 3 or more. Values represent the average score for each animal. Results are considered significantly different when p < 0.05. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6).

DM, diabetes mellitus; Dapa, dapagliflozin; Lira, liraglutide.

*p < 0.05 versus control.

#p < 0.05 versus diabetic group.