Table A.4.
Key elements (concepts) | Eligibility criteria | Rationale | |
---|---|---|---|
Time | In | Study is published since 2016 | Focus on new evidence that became available after the publication of EFSA (2016) |
Language | In | Study is reported in English (EN), French (FR) or Spanish (ES) | Include evidence reported in local case reports written in ES or FR to cover languages of regions where teosinte has been reported to occur |
Publication type | In |
– Primary research studies (i.e.. studies generating new data) – Conference abstracts or posters if they contain primary data – Reports of the Competent Authorities of EU Member States – Reviews (reviews will be used as sources of further references and to assess the appropriateness of the search strategy applied) |
– Cover new data or assess the appropriateness of the search strategy applied – Include reports of the Competent Authorities of EU Member States to address the mandate, as not necessarily reported elsewhere or accessible – Exclude opinions/statements, as they do not report primary data – Exclude PhD theses and dissertations, as primary data reported are assumed to have been published in primary research studies |
Out |
– Letters to the editor and editorials – Expert opinions – PhD theses and dissertations |