Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2021 Dec 16;33(3):324–332.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2021.12.017

Table.

Quantitative Performance Measurements of the U-Net and Threshold Methods versus the Radiologist Lipiodol Segmentation Ground Truth

Mode evaluation metrics Threshold compared with the ground truth U-net compared with the ground truth Two-tailed t test between threshold and U-net
MSE 185.98 ± 93.82 125.53 ± 107.36 P = .0046
CM* (mm) 31.34 ± 30.24 15.31 ± 14.63 P = .000012
Fractional volume ratios 2.58 ± 3.52 1.22 ± 0.84 P = .048
DSC 0.45 ± 0.22 0.65 ± 0.17 P = .000025

Note–The results are averaged over all patients. Note the improved performance of the U-net over the threshold method in predicting Lipiodol deposition on conventional transarterial chemoembolization. Score evaluation: MSE and CM: lower score indicates higher accuracy. Fractional volume ratios and DSC: closer to 1 indicates higher accuracy.

CM = center of mass; DSC = dice similarity coefficient; MSE = mean squared error.

*

CM values represent the distance from the Lipiodol’s center of mass.

Fractional volume represents the fraction of total volume predicted over the ground truth. ie, Fractional volume = (predicted volume of Lipiodol)/(ground truth volume of Lipiodol).