Table.
Quantitative Performance Measurements of the U-Net and Threshold Methods versus the Radiologist Lipiodol Segmentation Ground Truth
| Mode evaluation metrics | Threshold compared with the ground truth | U-net compared with the ground truth | Two-tailed t test between threshold and U-net |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSE | 185.98 ± 93.82 | 125.53 ± 107.36 | P = .0046 |
| CM* (mm) | 31.34 ± 30.24 | 15.31 ± 14.63 | P = .000012 |
| Fractional volume ratios† | 2.58 ± 3.52 | 1.22 ± 0.84 | P = .048 |
| DSC | 0.45 ± 0.22 | 0.65 ± 0.17 | P = .000025 |
Note–The results are averaged over all patients. Note the improved performance of the U-net over the threshold method in predicting Lipiodol deposition on conventional transarterial chemoembolization. Score evaluation: MSE and CM: lower score indicates higher accuracy. Fractional volume ratios and DSC: closer to 1 indicates higher accuracy.
CM = center of mass; DSC = dice similarity coefficient; MSE = mean squared error.
CM values represent the distance from the Lipiodol’s center of mass.
Fractional volume represents the fraction of total volume predicted over the ground truth. ie, Fractional volume = (predicted volume of Lipiodol)/(ground truth volume of Lipiodol).