Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 1;51(4):afac065. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afac065

Table 3.

Improvement in predictive performance (measured using c-index) when adding the deep learning predicted age (RetiAGE score) to the risk models in the UK Biobank study

Model 0: RetiAGE Model 1: CA Model 2: CA + RetiAGE Model 3: PhenoAGE Model 4: PhenoAGE + RetiAGE
Primary outcome
All-cause mortality 0.664 (0.653–0.675) 0.706 (0.696–0.716) 0.720 (0.709–0.730)a 0.737 (0.727–0.747) 0.750 (0.740–0.760)a
CVD mortality 0.702 (0.684–0.720) 0.742 (0.725–0.759) 0.760 (0.744–0.777)a 0.788 (0.773–0.802) 0.804 (0.790–0.819)a
Cancer mortality 0.657 (0.642–0.671) 0.696 (0.682–0.709) 0.709 (0.695–0.722)a 0.718 (0.705–0.731) 0.732 (0.718–0.745)a
Secondary outcome
CVD event 0.646 (0.631–0.661) 0.691 (0.673–0.705) 0.701 (0.687–0.716)a 0.720 (0.706–0.733) 0.730 (0.716–0.744)a
Cancer event 0.601 (0.593–0.608) 0.629 (0.622–0.636) 0.637 (0.629–0.644)a 0.646 (0.639–0.654) 0.653 (0.646–0.661)a

The values in the table corresponded to the expressed as c-index with their 95% confidence intervals

aSignificant difference between Model 1 and 2 (P < 0.001), and Model 3 and 4 (P < 0.001) based on DeLong’s method.

CVD = cardiovascular disease; RetiAGE = deep learning predicted biological age; PhenoAGE = phenotypic age calculated based on clinical biomarkers (CA, albumin, creatinine, glucose, C-reactive protein [log], lymphocyte percent, mean [red] cell volume, red cell distribution width, alkaline phosphatase, white blood cell count)