Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 29;10:e13195. doi: 10.7717/peerj.13195

Table 1. Pairwise comparisons between different set structures for the odds of staying above 20% velocity loss threshold broken down by exercise and training set.

Description Statistics
Comparison Exercise Set number Odds ratio SE Z score p value
CS/RR Bench press 1 0.500 0.181 –1.914 0.056
CS/TS Bench press 1 2.600 0.792 3.138 0.003
RR/TS Bench press 1 5.205 1.946 4.412 0.000
CS/RR Back squat 1 0.413 0.273 –1.339 0.180
CS/TS Back squat 1 3.767 1.783 2.802 0.010
RR/TS Back squat 1 9.126 5.625 3.587 0.001
CS/RR Bench press 2 0.330 0.120 –3.060 0.004
CS/TS Bench press 2 2.360 0.688 2.947 0.004
RR/TS Bench press 2 7.145 2.711 5.183 0.000
CS/RR Back squat 2 0.525 0.327 –1.036 0.300
CS/TS Back squat 2 4.948 2.285 3.462 0.001
RR/TS Back squat 2 9.431 5.335 3.967 0.000
CS/RR Bench press 3 0.589 0.187 –1.670 0.095
CS/TS Bench press 3 2.463 0.697 3.183 0.003
RR/TS Bench press 3 4.180 1.419 4.214 0.000
CS/RR Back squat 3 0.888 0.454 –0.233 0.816
CS/TS Back squat 3 4.646 1.985 3.596 0.001
RR/TS Back squat 3 5.234 2.420 3.581 0.001

Note:

CS, Cluster set structure; TS, Traditional set structure; RR, Rest redistribution set structure; SE, Standard error.