Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 1;36(5-6):331–347. doi: 10.1101/gad.349172.121

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Nucleolar disruption induces Dux relocalization and activation. (A,B) Representative confocal images and scoring of Dux localization in the indicated embryo stages. (n) Number of pronuclei or nuclei; embryos from two independent experiments were scored. P-values, χ2 test. Scale bar, 20 µm. (C,D) Example images of chromatin distribution as marked by DAPI staining in 3D-SIM imaging experiments in 2C-pos versus 2C-neg cells (C) and in ESCs upon 8-h iPol I (D). (D) 2C-neg cells and control but not iPol I ESCs have nucleolar chromatin fibers, visible as a roughened nucleolar border (orange arrows, inset). Scale bar, 5 µm. (E) Representative immuno-DNA FISH images at the indicated time points of iPol I for Dux alleles (red) compared with nucleolar (B23, green) or nuclear lamina (LaminB; not shown) compartments. Scale bar, 10 µm. (F) Quantification of Dux localization at 4-h iPol I showing movement away from the nucleolus. P-values, χ2 test. (n) Number of nuclei scored. (G) Dot plot of GSEA enrichment scores (NES) and significance (FDR) for type I or type II NADs using expression data following iPol I or following LINE1/Ncl KD (Percharde et al. 2018). (H) Box plot of log2 fold change values for type I NADs (n = 1565) or type II NADs (n = 371) versus all genes at 8-h iPol I. P-values, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, comparing type I/II NADs with all genes.