Table 2.
Global statistics comparison between TBGA, EU-ADR [13], CoMAGC [15], PolySearch [14], GAD [27], and GDAE [28] datasets
| Dataset | Annotation | Instances | Publications | Inst.s/pub. | Genes | Diseases | Relations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CoMAGC | Manual | 821 | 408 | 2.01 | 538 | 3 | 15 |
| EU-ADR | Manual | 355 | 65 | 5.46 | 221 | 118 | 4 |
| PolySearch | Manual | 522 | 374 | 1.40 | 245 | 10 | 2 |
| GAD | Weak | 5329 | 4112 | 1.30 | 1139 | 535 | 3 |
| GDAE | Weak | 8000 | 5875 | 1.36 | 3635 | 1904 | 2 |
| TBGA | Weak | 218,973 | 134,059 | 1.63 | 11,784 | 9199 | 4 |
Columns represent, from left to right, the considered dataset, the type of annotation, the total number of instances and publications, the average number of instances per publication, as well as the total number of genes, diseases, and relations