TABLE 4.
QTL associated by GWA with grain arsenic concentration (qAs) in the Rice Minicore Panel (RMC) arranged in chromosomal order. Overlaps with QTL for other traits within this study, and candidate genes are also noted. Panels for which QTL are listed include “all RMC” containing all RMC accessions, indica subspecies, japonica subspecies, IND subgroup, and AUS subgroup.
| QTL | Chr | Start of QTL region (bp) a | End of QTL region (bp) a | QTL size (Mb) | Peak SNP location (bp) a | Panel QTL peak details from b | −log10(p) | Effect of most common allele c | Most common allele | Alter-nate allele | Nu. acc. with common allele | Nu. acc. with alt. allele | % panel having alt. allele | QTL overlaps among traits in this study | Co-location with QTL reported in literature | Candidate gene RAP ID d | Candidate gene symbol(s) or name(s) e |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| qAs1-1 | 1 | 1,34,61,779 | 1,36,17,444 | 0.156 | 1,35,33,400 | all RMC | 5.56 | −0.26 | C | T | 60 | 46 | 43.4 | DHD, PHT | – | – | – |
| qAs1-2 | 1 | 2,19,81,983 | 2,44,49,843 | 2.468 | 2,37,57,196 | all RMC | 5.17 | −0.11 | G | T | 71 | 39 | 35.5 | StHD, Si, DHD | Norton et al., 2014 | LOC_Os01g41720 | EnS-10 |
| qAs1-3 | 1 | 3,14,52,607 | 3,42,20,812 | 2.768 | 3,16,77,916 | all RMC | 5.67 | 0.15 | C | T | 108 | 21 | 16.3 | StHD, Si, Cu, DHD, PHT | – | LOC_Os01g56400 | ABCI7 |
| qAs2 | 2 | 2,15,23,027 | 2,17,30,651 | 0.208 | 2,15,75,358 | all RMC | 5.31 | 0.27 | G | A | 52 | 43 | 45.3 | P, S | – | LOC_Os02g36570 | ABC1-2 |
| qAs3 | 3 | 2,82,21,674 | 2,84,16,354 | 0.195 | 2,83,66,354 | all RMC | 5.91 | −0.34 | A | G | 65 | 54 | 45.4 | – | Zhang et al., 2008; Liu et al., 2021 | LOC_Os03g49440 | phosphatase |
| qAs4 | 4 | 82,22,722 | 1,12,92,867 | 3.070 | 90,09,797 | all RMC | 5.75 | 0.21 | A | T | 85 | 9 | 9.6 | Si | – | LOC_Os04g16450 | PIP2;6 |
| ↓ | LOC_Os04g17660 | HAC1;2 | |||||||||||||||
| qAs6-1 | 6 | 1,30,39,217 | 1,31,69,010 | 0.130 | 1,31,15,883 | indica | 6.09 | −0.14 | C | T | 55 | 11 | 16.7 | – | – | LOC_Os06g22960 | TIP2;2 |
| qAs6-2 | 6 | 1,76,19,751 | 1,92,18,461 | 1.599 | 1,90,23,908 | all RMC | 5.03 | 0.17 | G | T | 106 | 7 | 6.2 | DHD, Cu | Zhang et al., 2008 | LOC_Os06g29790 | PHO1 |
| ↓ | LOC_Os06g29844, LOC_Os06g29950, LOC_Os06g29994 | Cluster of 3 MATE genes | |||||||||||||||
| ↓ | |||||||||||||||||
| ↓ | |||||||||||||||||
| qAs7-1 | 7 | 1,05,06,160 | 1,25,89,848 | 2.084 | 1,18,74,171 | all RMC | 6.13 | 0.18 | G | A | 89 | 11 | 11.0 | S | Norton et al., 2014 | ─ | ─ |
| qAs7-2 | 7 | 2,26,36,921 | 2,45,33,222 | 1.896 | 2,26,86,921 | all RMC | 5.42 | −0.16 | G | A | 82 | 31 | 27.4 | DHD, P | Norton et al., 2014 | LOC_Os07g41310 | Similar to Phytochelatin synthetase |
| qAs8 | 8 | 3,94,274 | 18,15,831 | 1.422 | 5,98,139 | all RMC | 6.24 | −0.37 | A | G | 43 | 39 | 47.6 | StHD | Norton et al., 2014; Liu et al., 2021 | LOC_Os08g03020 | transmembrane receptor protein |
| ↓ | LOC_Os08g03380 | heat shock protein | |||||||||||||||
| ↓ | |||||||||||||||||
| ↓ | LOC_Os08g03470 to LOC_03650 | 7 BTB-domain containing genes | |||||||||||||||
| ↓ | |||||||||||||||||
| qAs10 | 10 | 2,09,14,520 | 2,11,45,930 | 0.231 | 2,10,12,106 | AUS | 5.24 | −0.09 | A | G | 10 | 9 | 47.4 | – | – | LOC_Os10g37920 | MATE |
| ↓ | LOC_Os10g39980 | Lsi3 | |||||||||||||||
| qAs11-1 | 11 | 83,21,863 | 89,01,679 | 0.580 | 88,40,750 | indica | 6.23 | 0.20 | C | T | 42 | 7 | 14.3 | S, Ca | – | – | – |
| qAs11-2 | 11 | 2,50,34,091 | 2,59,95,458 | 0.961 | 2,52,09,544 | all RMC | 5.35 | 0.17 | G | A | 116 | 9 | 7.2 | DHD | Norton et al., 2014 | – | – |
O. sativa SNPs are identified by their physical location based on the Os-Nipponbare-Reference-IRGSP-1.0 assembly (Kawahara et al., 2013).
The panels are defined as the complete Rice Minicore Diversity Panel (RMC, n = 166). The O. sativa subpopulation groups were tropical japonica (TRJ), temperate japonica (TEJ), aus (AUS), and indica (IND). The two O. sativa subspecies are indica, composed of IND and AUS combined, and japonica comprised TEJ and TRJ. QTL were often identified in GWA-mapping of more than one population (e.g., in INDAUS and AUS). Because alternate alleles became very rare in the smaller subpopulations, the table presents the results based on the entire RMC panel when the QTL was significant there.
A negative allele effect reflects a reduction in the trait associated with the most common allele.
RAP ID is the Rice Annotation Project identification locus identified for the candidate gene.
Gene nomenclature followed the standardized nomenclature for rice genes used in Oryzabase (Yamazaki et al., 2010).