Table 1.

Simulation results for estimation of treatment misassignment rate (%).

				A			A			A			A
	Marker	Method		Est	SD		Est	SD		Est	SD		Est	SD
	New	Ideal		0.35	0.61		0.41	0.64		0.19	0.30		0.18	0.28
Case 1
0.1	New	EC		0.49	0.79		0.56	0.89		0.26	0.38		0.23	0.36
	Standard	Naive		4.91	1.06		4.93	1.07		4.94	0.54		4.82	0.52
[0.05in]0.3	New	EC		0.77	1.24		0.75	1.21		0.40	0.62		0.38	0.57
	Standard	Naive		8.00	1.27		7.99	1.26		8.12	0.64		7.84	0.61
[0.05in]0.5	New	EC		1.02	1.62		1.07	1.81		0.69	1.17		0.54	0.87
	Standard	Naive		10.00	1.40		9.63	1.39		9.98	0.73		9.61	0.71
[0.05in]0.7	New	EC		1.31	2.33		1.92	3.62		1.04	2.04		0.99	1.97
	Standard	Naive		11.46	1.51		10.85	1.48		11.37	0.77		10.84	0.71
Case 2
0.1	New	EC		0.60	0.95		0.66	0.96		0.32	0.47		0.32	0.48
	Standard	Naive		4.91	1.08		4.83	1.03		4.91	0.54		4.85	0.53
0.3	New	EC		0.71	1.07		0.75	1.08		0.38	0.55		0.38	0.57
	Standard	Naive		8.05	1.26		7.82	1.24		8.09	0.67		7.88	0.64
0.5	New	EC		0.73	1.11		0.78	1.12		0.41	0.59		0.41	0.61
	Standard	Naive		9.93	1.41		9.54	1.33		9.95	0.70		9.63	0.71
0.7	New	EC		0.74	1.13		0.80	1.14		0.42	0.61		0.42	0.63
	Standard	Naive		11.30	1.45		10.78	1.43		11.30	0.74		10.84	0.75
Case 3
0.1	New	EC		0.47	0.73		0.43	0.71		0.21	0.33		0.23	0.35
	Standard	Naive		3.59	0.96		3.47	0.88		3.50	0.48		3.46	0.47
[0.05in]0.3	New	EC		0.60	0.94		0.57	0.91		0.25	0.40		0.31	0.45
	Standard	Naive		5.96	1.13		5.80	1.08		5.92	0.56		5.80	0.55
[0.05in]0.5	New	EC		0.75	1.27		0.71	1.09		0.31	0.49		0.39	0.56
	Standard	Naive		7.43	1.23		7.26	1.19		7.44	0.62		7.25	0.59
[0.05in]0.7	New	EC		0.78	1.28		0.96	1.56		0.47	0.76		0.46	0.72
	Standard	naive		8.60	1.26		8.30	1.34		8.64	0.68		8.36	0.65

EC, error corrected; Est, estimate; SD, empirical standard deviation.