Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 3;77(4):710–720. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbab144

Table 1.

Descriptive Characteristics of Two Samples

MIDUS II (n = 2,012)2 MIDUS Refresher (n = 779) Difference test3 p value
M or % SD M or % SD
Demographic and heath covariates
Age 56.21 12.20 47.86 12.66 16.06 <.001
Sex, male 43% 44% 0.64 .424
Race, White 84% 85% 0.12 .730
Education1 7.26 2.52 8.01 2.44 −7.16 <.001
Physical health 3.56 1.01 3.57 1.09 −0.10 .917
Main variables
Activity diversity 71.72 14.48 73.35 12.82 −2.92 <.001
Total activity time (in hours) 11.61 4.71 12.40 4.22 −4.28 <.001
Positive emodiversity 95.79 7.75 94.98 8.00 2.47 .013
Mean positive emotions 2.72 0.71 2.53 0.75 6.38 <.001
Total # of days with positive emotions 7.24 1.39 7.30 1.58 −0.82 .415
Negative emodiversity 19.47 19.71 23.07 21.04 −4.13 <.001
Mean negative emotions 0.21 0.28 0.23 0.29 −1.94 .052
Total # of days with negative emotions 7.35 1.30 7.36 1.51 −0.22 .823

Notes: MIDUS = Midlife in the United States Study.

1Education was coded on a 12-level scale, where 7 means 3 or more years of college education (no degree yet) and 8 means graduated from 2-year college, vocational school, or have an associate degree.

2Of 2,012 MIDUS II sample, n = 179 (9%) were Milwaukee subsample. We controlled for Milwaukee subsample (vs not) in subsequent analyses using MIDUS II data. The nature of all effects was consistent with and without the Milwaukee subsample. There was no Milwaukee subsample who participated in the diary study of MIDUS Refresher.

3 t-Tests were used for continuous variables; chi-squared tests were used for categorical variables.