Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 1;18(4):1013–1020. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.9776

Table 2.

Study outcomes at 3 months.

Total Cohort Urban Residence Rural Residence P
CPAP use, h
All patients 3.19 (2.8–3.58), n = 242 3.25 (2.74–3.75), n = 142 3.08 (2.46–3.69), n = 100 .67
CPAP use > 0 4.89 (4.51–5.28), n = 157 4.80 (4.29–5.3), n = 96 5.04 (4.42–5.66), n = 61 .55
Adherent, n (%) 85 (35), n = 242 51 (36), n = 142 34 (34), n = 100 .76
Change in ESS –2.5 (–3.2 to –1.8), n = 136 –2.3 (–3.2 to –1.4), n = 90 –2.8 (–4 to –1.7), n = 46 .47
Change in EQ-5D-3L 1.3 (–1.1 to 3.7), n = 137 –0.5 (–3.7 to 2.8), n = 89 4.6 (1.5–7.6), n = 48 .04
VSQ-9 total score 38 (37–39), n = 130 38 (37–39), n = 86 38 (36–40), n = 44 .90

Results are presented as mean (95% CI) unless otherwise indicated. CI = confidence interval, CPAP = continuous positive airway pressure, EQ-5D-3L = EuroQOL-5D 3-level visual analog score, ESS = Epworth Sleepiness Scale score, VSQ-9 = Visit-Specific Satisfaction Instrument.