Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 24;27(17):4768–4780. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-0529

Table 1.

Multivariate analysis of DFS including clinical, pathologic, mutational, immunologic variables, and CMS combination (model 1).

Term HR 95% CI P
Age:
 >70 y vs. ≤70 y 1.22 0.93–1.59 0.15
Gender:
 Male vs. female 1.14 0.95–1.37 0.17
WHO score:
 1–2 vs. 0 1.40 1.13–1.73 0.002
Bowel obstruction or perforation:
 Yes vs. no 1.26 1.02–1.55 0.035
T stage:
 T4 vs. T1–T3 2.05 1.69–2.49 <0.0001
N stage:
 N2 vs. N1 1.92 1.6–2.3 <0.0001
Grade:
 G1–G2 vs. G3–G4 1.14 0.91–1.41 0.25
RAS statusa
 RAS mutated vs. RAS wildtype 1.40 1.17–1.68 0.0003
T-cell tumor infiltration:
 Low and intermediate vs. high infiltration 1.42 1.16–1.74 0.0006
CMS combination:
 High-risk vs. low-risk CMS combination 1.74 1.38–2.19 <0.0001

Note: R2 = 0.118; likelihood ratio = 194.7; degree of freedom = 10; Harrell C-index = 0.685. Model 1 versus model 0 likelihood ratio test P < 0.0001 (χ2 test); C-indexes are statistically significantly different (P < 0.03).

Abbreviations: WHO, World Health Organization; y, years.

aKRAS or NRAS.