Table 1.
Multivariate analysis of DFS including clinical, pathologic, mutational, immunologic variables, and CMS combination (model 1).
Term | HR | 95% CI | P |
---|---|---|---|
Age: | |||
>70 y vs. ≤70 y | 1.22 | 0.93–1.59 | 0.15 |
Gender: | |||
Male vs. female | 1.14 | 0.95–1.37 | 0.17 |
WHO score: | |||
1–2 vs. 0 | 1.40 | 1.13–1.73 | 0.002 |
Bowel obstruction or perforation: | |||
Yes vs. no | 1.26 | 1.02–1.55 | 0.035 |
T stage: | |||
T4 vs. T1–T3 | 2.05 | 1.69–2.49 | <0.0001 |
N stage: | |||
N2 vs. N1 | 1.92 | 1.6–2.3 | <0.0001 |
Grade: | |||
G1–G2 vs. G3–G4 | 1.14 | 0.91–1.41 | 0.25 |
RAS statusa | |||
RAS mutated vs. RAS wildtype | 1.40 | 1.17–1.68 | 0.0003 |
T-cell tumor infiltration: | |||
Low and intermediate vs. high infiltration | 1.42 | 1.16–1.74 | 0.0006 |
CMS combination: | |||
High-risk vs. low-risk CMS combination | 1.74 | 1.38–2.19 | <0.0001 |
Note: R2 = 0.118; likelihood ratio = 194.7; degree of freedom = 10; Harrell C-index = 0.685. Model 1 versus model 0 likelihood ratio test P < 0.0001 (χ2 test); C-indexes are statistically significantly different (P < 0.03).
Abbreviations: WHO, World Health Organization; y, years.
aKRAS or NRAS.