Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 6;4(1):8–15. doi: 10.1097/BS9.0000000000000098

Table 1.

Comparison of different DNA Methylation measuring methods.

Base conversion

Category Endonuclease digestion Affinity enrichment Bisulfite-dependent Bisulfite-free
Methods MRE-seq MeDIP-seq MBD-seq RRBS WGBS TAPS EM-seq
Resolution Single-base 150–300 bp Single-base
Coverage +/– + +
DNA input + + + +
Cost + +
Application Site-specific studies Low-resolution, large-scale studies High resolution, whole-genome studies
Pros Cost-effective, user-friendly High sensitivity, low cost Detect whole-genome methylation at single-base
Cons Enzyme-dependent methylation detection; incomplete digestion Low resolution; biased towards highly methylated regions DNA degradation; high cost; reduced sequence complexity Unsuitable for single cells; Large investment

EM-seq = Enzymatic Methyl-seq, MBD = methyl-CpG-binding domain protein, MeDIP = methylated DNA immunoprecipitation, MRE = methylation sensitive restriction enzyme, RRBS = reduced representation bisulfite sequencing, -seq = sequencingg, TAPS = TET-assisted pyridine borane sequencing, WGBS = whole-genome bisulfite sequencin.

Coverage, DNA input and cost in table 1 are divided into 5 levels, followed by + + > + > +/– > – > – –.