TABLE IV. Comparison With State-of-the-Art Algorithms.
Study | Year | Device | #PD | #sensors | #raters | r | RMSE | ICC |
[20] | 2012 | IMU | 42 | 5 | 3 | 0.79 | 0.46 | – |
[14] | 2015 | IMU | 34 | 3 | 3 | 0.79 | – | – |
[21] | 2015 | Smartphone | 14 | 1 | 0.5 | – | – | |
[22] | 2018 | Smartphone | 44 | 1 | – | – | 0.88 | |
[18] | 2019 | IMU | 19 | 2 | 3 | 0.83 | 0.53 | 0.89 |
[23] | 2019 | IMU | 50 | 2 | 2 | n.r. | n.r. | n.r. |
Proposed | 2019 | Smartphone | 93 | 1 | 4 | 0.92 | 0.42 | 0.88 |
Dedicated Application-Performed Evaluation. Values not Explicitly Reported Within the Text.