Skip to main content
. 2000 Mar;44(3):747–751. doi: 10.1128/aac.44.3.747-751.2000

TABLE 2.

In vitro susceptibilities to fluconazole and itraconazole of BSI isolates of various species of Candida from 1997 and 1998

Species Yr No. of isolates Antifungal agent MIC (μg/ml)a
% Rb
Range 50% 90%
C. albicans 1997c 163 Fluconazole 0.12–>128 0.25 1.0 0.6
Itraconazole 0.015–>8.0 0.06 0.12 0.6
1998 181 Fluconazole 0.12–>128 0.25 0.5 1.1
Itraconazole 0.008–>8.0 0.03 0.12 2.2
C. glabrata 1997c 46 Fluconazole 1.0–>128 8.0 32 8.7
Itraconazole 0.12–>8.0 0.5 2.0 36.9
1998 58 Fluconazole 0.25–128 8.0 16 5.2
Itraconazole 0.06–>8.0 0.5 2.0 32.8
C. parapsilosis 1997c 48 Fluconazole 0.12–4.0 1.0 2.0 0
Itraconazole 0.015–0.5 0.12 0.25 0
1998 47 Fluconazole 0.25–4.0 0.5 1.0 0
Itraconazole 0.015–0.5 0.06 0.25 0
C. tropicalis 1997c 24 Fluconazole 0.25–4.0 0.5 2.0 0
Itraconazole 0.03–1.0 0.12 0.5 4.2
1998 28 Fluconazole 0.25–8.0 0.5 1.0 0
Itraconazole 0.015–1.0 0.06 0.5 3.6
C. krusei 1997c 6 Fluconazole 32–64 32 100
Itraconazole 0.12–2.0 1.0 66.6
1998 4 Fluconazole 8.0–32 32 100d
Itraconazole 0.12–0.5 0.25 0
a

50% and 90%, MICs for 50 and 90% of isolates tested, respectively. 

b

% R, percent resistant as determined by using interpretive breakpoint criteria of the NCCLS (13): fluconazole resistance, ≥64 μg/ml; itraconazole resistance, ≥1.0 μg/ml. 

c

Adapted from the work of Pfaller et al. (20). 

d

Isolates of C. krusei are considered resistant to fluconazole, regardless of the MIC.