Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 9;90(2):200–214. doi: 10.1007/s00239-022-10052-6

Table 3.

Results of the tree-based analyses performed on the full molecular backbone of Rabosky et al. (2018) and two sampled trees with inferred mitochondrial and nuclear substitutions

Tree Slope Likelihood ratio P value δ
Backbone 2.4×10-4 27.05 1.98×10-7 1.03
Mitochondrial 2.4×10-3 25.80 3.79×10-5 1.98
Nuclear 1.2×10-5 0.54 0.46 1.00

The results are shown with root-to-tip path length as the response variable. A significant likelihood ratio test (bold type) indicates a likely correlation between substitutions and node numbers. The combination of a significant likelihood ratio test and a δ curvilinearity value greater than one indicates the likely presence of the node-density artefact in the Actinopterygian tree. Trends are plotted in Figs. S13, S14 available as Supplementary Information