Fig. 3. Alignment of hBN and graphene islands on different twinned Cu surfaces.
SEM images of typical 2D material alignment experimentally observed on twinned Cu surface (left panels) compared with theoretical prediction (right panels). a–c are typical hBN islands grown on twinned Cu surfaces, in which all hBN islands shown in (a) and (b) are parallelly aligned while those shown in (c) show antiparallel alignment. d the theoretical prediction and experimental statistics of the misalignment angle of hBN grown on different substrates (The error bar is the standard deviation of raw data.). e–g, are typical graphene islands grown on twinned Cu surfaces, in which (e) and (f) show parallelly aligned graphene islands while islands in (g) are misaligned on both sides of the twin boundary. The angle between the 2D island edge and the twin boundary is marked in the corresponding theoretical diagram. Surface indices of the twin crystals are shown in each figure. The scale bars in all graphs are 10 μm. h the theoretical prediction and experimental statistics of the misalignment angles of graphene grown on different substrates (The error bar is the standard deviation of raw data.).