Table 2.

The major topics with participant count, percentages, and examples.

Major topics and subthemes			Examples
Visual-Patient-avatar positive (61/307, 20%)
	Design	Especially oxygenation and body temperature well displayed. [#a11.2] Integration of all values on one avatar. [#47.2]
	Usability	Information simplified by Visual-Patient-avatar. [#13.2] Overview of relevant parameters at a glance through Visual-Patient-avatar. [#25.2]
Visual-Patient-avatar negative (99/307, 32%)
	Design	The blood pressure feature was not easy to understand for me. [#24.2] Visual-Patient-avatar: head too large in contrast to heart and lung. [#25.1]
	Usability	Visual-Patient-avatar takes some time getting used to; not entirely intuitive at first. [#29.2] At the moment still difficult but with potential. [#38.1]
	Incompleteness	Numbers and ranks are missing. [#10.1] Lacking information quantification with the Visual-Patient-avatar. [#48.1]
Split Screen positive (79/307, 26%)
	Additional information	Additional information by Visual-Patient-avatar. [#14.2] I like the combination of new and old monitoring. [#18.2]
	Safety aspects	With Visual-Patient-avatar changes faster visible than with numbers or curves. [#13.1] More safety. [#41.1]
	Usability	Split monitoring helps to focus. [#10.1] I prefer the split monitor, Visual-Patient-avatar as first initial diagnosis—quantification via Conventional monitoring. [#16.1]
Split Screen negative (60/307, 20%)
	Size	Info partly displayed a bit small. [#13.2] Needs appropriate monitor size. [#24.1]
	Overload	Too much information at once in the emergency situation. [#12.2] Screen very full. [#30.2]
	Visual-Patient-avatar ignored	Looked at numbers. [#9.1] I barely looked at the Visual-Patient-avatar. [#18.2]
Conventional monitor (8/307, 3%)			I want to see the details or parameter more precisely. I prefer the “usual” monitor view. [#26.1]

^aParticipant number.