Table 3.
Adjusted odds ratios (AOR), 95% confidence intervals and p-values for determinants of supply of unprotected sex among SWs before, during and after the 2010 WC in South Africa.
| Before (Phase 1) |
During (Phase 2) |
After (Phase 3) |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adjusted Odds ratio [95% CI] | p-value | Adjusted Odds ratio [95% CI] | p-value | Adjusted Odds ratio [95% CI] | p-value | |
| Price (ln) | 1.3[0.6–2.6] | 0.530 | 0.9[0.6–1.2] | 0.407 | 0.9[0.6–1.2] | 0.396 |
| Gender | ||||||
| Female | Ref | Ref | Ref | |||
| Male | 1.1[0.2–6.2] | 0.927 | 0.8[0.2–3.1] | 0.797 | 0.7[0.2–3.5] | 0.708 |
| Transgender | 0.1[0.0–0.6] | 0.012 | 0.9[0.3–2.8] | 0.917 | 0.9[0.3–3.1] | 0.867 |
| Level of Education | ||||||
| None | Ref | Ref | Ref | |||
| Primary | 0.7[0.1–5.8] | 0.761 | 0.6[0.2–1.5] | 0.252 | 0.9[0.4–2.2] | 0.844 |
| Secondary+ | 1.7[0.2–12.5] | 0.601 | 0.6[0.2–1.5] | 0.265 | 0.8[0.4–2.0] | 0.714 |
| Location of sex work | ||||||
| Street | Ref | Ref | Ref | |||
| Hotel/Brothel | 0.9[0.2–3.7] | 0.865 | 0.4[0.2–1.1] | 0.069 | 0.6[0.3–1.2] | 0.122 |
| Massage | 5.0[0.1–300.9] | 0.439 | 10.1[2.1–48.7] | 0.004 | ||
| Shebeen | 2.9[0.4–20.5] | 0.275 | 1.1[0.2–5.0] | 0.950 | 2.4[0.6–8.8] | 0.202 |
| Combination | 1.1[0.2–7.0] | 0.947 | 0.6[0.2–1.3] | 0.160 | 0.5[0.2–1.1] | 0.082 |
| Age (Years) | 0.9[0.8–0.9] | 0.001 | 1.0[0.9–1.1] | 0.885 | 1.0[0.9–1.0] | 0.277 |
| Previous work | ||||||
| No job | Ref | Ref | Ref | |||
| Cashier | 1.2[0.2–7.5] | 0.833 | 0.8[0.2–2.4] | 0.638 | 0.5[0.2–1.4] | 0.178 |
| Beauty/hairdresser | 0.2[0.0–2.1] | 0.167 | 0.4[0.1–1.1] | 0.071 | 1.0[0.4–2.2] | 0.913 |
| Tailor | 2.7[0.4–19.8] | 0.323 | 0.9[0.3–3.2] | 0.923 | 1.2[0.2–6.5] | 0.799 |
| Student | 1.2[0.4–4.2] | 0.733 | 0.8[0.3–2.0] | 0.614 | 1.0[0.4–2.2] | 0.932 |
| Waitress | 1.5[0.2–12.2] | 0.723 | 0.5[0.2–1.6] | 0.242 | 0.8[0.3–2.2] | 0.666 |
| Alternative income source | ||||||
| No | Ref | Ref | Ref | |||
| Yes | 0.3[0.1–1.6] | 0.168 | 2.2[1.0–4.7] | 0.039 | 0.9[0.5–1.9] | 0.844 |
| Has a non-commercial partner | ||||||
| No | Ref | Ref | Ref | |||
| Yes | 0.7[0.2–2.4] | 0.592 | 0.5[0.2–1.1] | 0.070 | 1.3[0.8–2.4] | 0.305 |
| Number of clients seen in the last week (ln) | 0.7[0.4–1.3] | 0.303 | 1.4[0.8–2.5] | 0.223 | 0.8[0.6–1.2] | 0.265 |
| Type of sex | ||||||
| Vaginal sex | Ref | Ref | Ref | |||
| Anal sex | 54.9[15.0–200.4] | <0.001 | 10.5[4.3–25.4] | <0.001 | 5.5[2.1–14.9] | 0.001 |
| Oral sex | 23.2[6.6–81.6] | <0.001 | 20.1[8.2–49.1] | <0.001 | 14.5[7.2–28.8] | <0.001 |
| Masturbation | 8.0[0.4–169.2] | 0.183 | 33.5[13.1–86.1] | <0.001 | 33.1[13.4–82.2] | <0.001 |
| Whether drunk during sex | ||||||
| No | Ref | Ref | Ref | |||
| Yes | 1.0[0.3–3.8] | 0.959 | 1.6[0.8–3.2] | 0.161 | 3.3[1.9–5.8] | <0.001 |
| Number of dependents | ||||||
| None | Ref | Ref | Ref | |||
| 1 to 3 adults or children | 3.3[0.8–14.2] | 0.111 | 1.3[0.5–3.9] | 0.576 | 0.4[0.2–0.9] | 0.035 |
| 4 or more adults or children | 4.0[0.7–21.9] | 0.109 | 0.9[0.3–2.9] | 0.807 | 0.4[0.1–1.1] | 0.088 |
| Whether had contact with the police in the past year | ||||||
| No | Ref | Ref | Ref | |||
| Ref | 0.7[0.2–2.2] | 0.514 | 0.6[0.3–1.1] | 0.110 | 0.9[0.5–1.7] | 0.705 |
| Whether visited a hospital in the last month | ||||||
| No | Ref | Ref | Ref | |||
| Yes | 1.4[0.4–5.1] | 0.631 | 0.7[0.4–1.4] | 0.357 | 0.9[0.4–1.7] | 0.649 |
| Log pseudolikelihood | -82.3 | -192.3 | -212.2 | |||
| Pseudo r-Squared | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.3 | |||
| Number of obs | 661 | 847 | 836 | |||
Ref – Reference category; -Excluded from the model; ln – Natural logarithm.