Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 1;22:233. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03299-6

Table 4.

Contact and referral patterns

All participants (n = 54) Introduction program (n = 25) Main program (n = 29)
Proportion of consultations related to headache n (%) n (%) n (%)
 ● 1–10% 13 (24%) 10 (40%) 3 (10%)
 ● 11–20% 29 (54%) 7 (28%) 22 (76%)
 ● 21–30% 8 (15%) 5 (20%) 3 (10%)
 ● 31–40% 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
 ● > 40% 4 (7%) 3 (12%) 1 (3%)
 ● None 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
Primary care Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Mean (SD)
 ● Contact from primary care for professional advice on headachea 2.37 (1.29) 1.89 (0.96) 2.86 (1.36)
 ● Collaboration with primary care for referred headache patientsb 2.63 (0.79) 2.60 (0.77) 2.66 (0.83)
Proportion of headache patients referred to tertiary/specialist care n (%) n (%) n (%)
 ● 1–10% 9 (17%) 4 (16%) 5 (17%)
 ● 11–20% 35 (65%) 14 (56%) 21 (72%)
 ● 21–30% 7 (13%) 5 (20%) 2 (7%)
 ● 31–40% 1 (2%) 1 (4%) 0 (0%)
 ● > 40% 1 (2%) 0 (0%) 1 (3%)
 ● Never 1 (2%) 1 (4%) 0 (0%)
Most common reason for referring to tertiary/specialist carec n (%) n (%) n (%)
 • Diagnostic uncertainty 20 (37%) 11 (44%) 9 (31%)
 • Suspicion of serious underlying cause 2 (4%) 2 (8%) 0 (0%)
 • Lack of treatment efficacy 32 (59%) 11 (44%) 21 (72%)
 • Desire/expectation of the patient 11 (20%) 5 (20%) 6 (21%)
 •Other 8 (15%) 5 (20%) 3 (10%)
Wait time for referral to tertiary/specialist care n (%) n (%) n (%)
 ● Short 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
 ● Acceptable 16 (30%) 11 (44%) 5 (17%)
 ● Long 21 (39%) 8 (32%) 13 (45%)
 ● Unacceptably long 8 (15%) 2 (8%) 6 (21%)
 ● Do not know 9 (17%) 4 (16%) 5 (21%)
Helpful for patients to be referred to tertiary/specialist cared Mean (SD) 2.33 (0.74) Mean (SD) 2.00 (0.76) Mean (SD) 2.62 (0.74)

aScale from 1–5; 1: never, 5: very frequently. bScale from 1–5; 1: none/very bad, 5: very good. cParticipants could choose up to two answers. dScale from 1–5; 1: not at all, 5: to a great extent. 10 (19%) responded they did not know