Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Apr 2.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Virol. 2018 Apr 10;104:1–4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2018.04.006

Table 3.

Performance characteristics of RGN RT-PCR versus reference PCR method.

Genogroup TP FP TN FN Sensitivity (95% CI) Specificity (95% CI) % PPV (95% CI) % NPV (95% CI)
Children GI 18 1 247 0 100 (78.1–100.0) 99.6 (97.4–99.9) 94.7 (71.9–99.7) 100 (98.1–100.0)
GII 58 0 205 3 95.1 (85.4–98.7) 100 (97.7–100) 100 (92.3–100) 98.6 (95.5–99.6)
Adults GI 6 5a 437 5c 54.5 (24.6–81.9) 98.9 (97.2–99.6) 54.5 (24.6–81.9) 98.9 (97.2–99.6)
GII 160 7b 277 9d 94.7 (89.8–97.4) 97.5 (94.8–98.9) 95.8 (91.2–98.2) 96.9 (93.9–98.5)
Children and Adult GI 24 6 684 5 82.8 (63.5–93.5) 99.1 (98.0–99.6) 80 (60.9–91.6) 99.3 (98.2–99.7)
GII 218 7 482 12 94.8 (90.8–97.2) 98.6 (96.9–99.4) 96.9 (93.4–98.6) 97.6 (95.7–98.7)
Overall GI and GII 244 7 453 15 94.2 (90.4–96.6) 98.5 (96.7–99.3) 97.2 (94.1–98.8) 96.8 (94.6–98.1)

TP = True positive; FP = False positive; TN = True negative; FN = False negative.

a

Of the 5 GI false positive (including 3 dual positives by the RGN RT-PCR assay), four specimens were classified as GII and one were negative by reference algorithm.

b

Of the 7 GII false positive (including one dual positive by the RGN RT-PCR assay), two specimens were classified as GI and five were negative by reference algorithm.

c

One specimen was misclassified as GII by the RGN RT-PCR assay.

d

One specimen was misclassified as GI by the RGN RT-PCR assay.