Table 2.
Comparison of the proposed approach with existing methods under the presence of quality measurement techniques against the phantom image (as shown in Figure 6).
| Methods | Noise level | SSIM | MSE | RMSE | PSNR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [41] | 0.2 | 0.88 | 19.85 | 13.08 | 22.64 |
| 0.4 | 0.84 | 26.66 | 18.61 | 18.91 | |
|
| |||||
| [42] | 0.2 | 0.80 | 24.76 | 14.72 | 15.28 |
| 0.4 | 0.90 | 19.01 | 16.99 | 23.05 | |
|
| |||||
| [43] | 0.2 | 0.85 | 23.89 | 13.91 | 18.89 |
| 0.4 | 0.80 | 18.94 | 15.76 | 16.58 | |
|
| |||||
| [44] | 0.2 | 0.83 | 22.67 | 11.90 | 22.75 |
| 0.4 | 0.86 | 18.41 | 14.84 | 18.41 | |
|
| |||||
| Proposed approach | 0.2 | 0.65 | 14.89 | 11.33 | 13.78 |
| 0.4 | 0.72 | 15.30 | 12.88 | 16.38 | |