Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Apr 4.
Published in final edited form as: J Heart Lung Transplant. 2021 Dec 26;41(4):438–441. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2021.12.008

Table 1.

Main Characteristics of the Study Population

Non-HF Baseline
Follow-up
CRT Responders CRT Non-Responders CRT Responders CRT Non-Responders
n 30 65 29 65 29
Age (years) 60.5±17.8 59.2±9.7 60.76±5.7 60.2±9.7 61.76±5.7
Sex (Female, %) 40.0 43.1 34.5 43.1 34.5
BMI (kg/m2) 24.6±3.2 24.6±2.61 23.78±2.2 24.8±2.3 23.6±2.0
HR (bpm) 75.4±8.2 76.4±8.67 77.31±8.2 76.5±8.5 78.2±8.5
QRS (ms) 93.1±6.5 166.6±9.9 165.56±12.9 154.3±9.2b 155.7±12.1b
Septal flash (%) - 76.6 42.9a - -
Apical rocking (%) - 85.5 45.8a - -
MWD ≥860 mmHg·(%) - 81.8 26.1a - -
NYHA (I-IV) N/A 2.88±0.7 2.82±0.6 2.66±0.67b 2.93±0.52a,b
LVEF (%) 61.1±7.2 27.1±2.8 27.3±3.3 33.0±4.0b 27.8±4.3
LVEDVi (ml/m2) 28.3±2.7 132.8±14.9 128.03±17.3 119.3±21.8b 130.1±14.1
LVESVi (ml/m2) 17.5±1.7 80.7±8.2 77.4±8.2 73.7±10.7 79.0±10.9
LAVi (ml/m2) 21.5±2.1 32.2±4.1 32.9655±5.1 27.1±5.4b 34.2±6.1a
Mitral Regurgitation (1-4) 0.43±0.5 2.1±0.8 2.3±1.2 1.7±0.9 2.3±1.0
Diabetes (%) 13.3 32.3 31.0 32.3 31.0
Hypertension (%) 30.0 56.9 48.3 55.4 48.3
Hyperlipidemia (%) 40.0 55.4 55.2 55.4 55.2
Kidney failure (%) 3.33 15.4 13.8 15.4 17.2a,b
LV lead position (n, %)
  -Postero-latero-basal N/A N/A N/A 38 (58.5) 17 (58.6)
  -Postero-latero-apical N/A N/A N/A 4 (6.15) 2 (6.8)
  -Antero-latero-basal N/A N/A N/A 22 (33.8) 10 (34.5)
  -Antero-latero-apical N/A N/A N/A 1 (1.54) 0 (0)
  Biventricular pacing N/A N/A N/A 92.7±4.7 90.9±5.4
β Blockers (%) 6.7 90.8 93.1 87.7 96.6a
ACEi/ARBs (%) 16.7 92.3 96.6 89.2 96.6
Diuretics (%) 10.0 86.2 86.2 76.9b 89.7a
QoL N/A 39.2±7.17 38.76±9.3 34.5±6.6b 43.3±10.5a,b
6-min walk (m) N/A 301.81±25.8 301.38±25.02 335.5±42.9b 295.3±22.7a
NT-proBNP (pg/ml) 77.9±29.2 1500.1±497 1656.9±443 1166.1±387b 1766.9±534
RyR Glycation (%) 3.46±6.5 26.05±7.7 35.03±5.54a 23.3±6.94b 38.0±4.81a,b

ACEi, Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors; ARBs, Angiotensin II receptor blockers; BMI, Body mass index; CRT, Cardiac resynchronization therapy; HR, heart rate; LAVi, Left atrium volume indexed by body surface; LV, Left ventricle; LVEDVi, Left ventricular end-diastolic volume indexed by body surface; LVEF, Left ventricular ejection fraction; LVESVi, Left ventricular end-systolic volume indexed by body surface; MWD, Myocardial work difference, lateral-to-septal (missing in 16 patients); NT-proBNP, N-terminal pro hormone B-type natriuretic peptide; NYHA, New York Heart Association (both NYHA and mitral regurgitation outcomes were also confirmed when considered as categorical variables); QoL, Quality of life (Minnesota living with HF);. QRS configuration was not significantly different between responders and non-responders at baseline (Left bundle branch block, LBBB, 76.9% vs 62.1%; Intraventricular conduction delay, IVCD, 18.5% vs 27.6%; RBBB, Right bundle branch block, 4.6% vs 10.3%). The presence or absence of septal flash was missing in 2 patients; the presence or absence of apical rocking was not assessed in 15 patients.

Data are means ± SD or percent.

a

p < .05 vs CRT-Responders (defined according to the clinical composite score)

b

p < .05 vs Baseline; Fisher exact test for dichotomous variables, Student's t test or Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables (the normal distribution was verified using the Shapiro-Wilk test).