Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 17;8(3):217–232. doi: 10.1002/cjp2.255

Table 4.

Summary of differences and similarities between BCOR‐ITD sarcomas of all localisations

Clinical data Histology Radiology Molecular biology
Age, median (range)) Prognosis # deceased mean delay Mitotic counts per 10 hpf (range) Immunostaining (features apply to all tumour types) DEGs
BCOR‐ITD sarcomas CCSK 2.0 (0.5–18.9) 0/7 0–18

BCOR

SATB2, Cyclin D1, BCL2, TLE1

WT1‐neg, SMARCB1 +

Heterogeneous masses

Necrosis

Haemorrhage

Low‐to‐moderate contrast enhancement

NTRK3

EGFR

PDGFRa

HG‐ESS 51.1 (25.8–62.4)

2/4

36 months

14–21

BCOR

SATB2, Cyclin D1, BCL2, TLE1

Desmin‐neg, Caldesmon‐neg

URCS 0.7 (0.1–19.7)

4/8

31 months

1.7–13.7

BCOR

SATB2, Cyclin D1, BCL2, TLE1

BCOR‐ITD CNS tumours HGNET‐BCOR 1.8 (1.2–7.6)

6/10

28 months

5–62

BCOR

SATB2, Cyclin D1, BCL2, TLE1

NeuN

GFAP+/−, Olig2 +/−

NTRK2

Wnt7b

PDGFRa

hpf, high‐power field.