Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 15;24(3):113–122. doi: 10.7602/jmis.2021.24.3.113

Table 2.

Meta-analysis for clinical effects of ICG angiography to reduce anastomotic leak

Study Year No. of enrolled study No. (ICG/control) Type of surgery Anasto-motic leak (%) Odds ratio 95% CI p value
Zhang and Che [42] 2021 29 2,354/3,522 AR and LAR 3.2/9.2 0.39 0.30–0.50 <0.00001
Arezzo et al. [43] 2020 9 862/468 Colorectal surgery 4.2/11.3 0.34 0.22–0.53 <0.001
Liu et al. [44] 2020 13 1,806/2,231 Colorectal surgery 3.8/7.8 0.4 0.33–0.59 <0.00001
Lin et al. [45] 2020 11 1,364/1,773 Colorectal surgery 2.9/30.8 0.31 0.21–0.44 <0.0001
Chan et al. [46] 2020 20 2,220/3,278 Colorectal surgery 3.7/8.6 0.46 0.31–0.62 <0.00001
Rausa et al. [47] 2019 11 555/1,768 Colorectal surgery 3.6/6.0 0.44 0.14–0.87 <0.05
Shen et al. [48] 2018 4 569/608 Laparoscopic and robotic LAR 1.8/6.4 0.27 0.13–0.53 <0.0002
Blanco-Colino et al. [49] 2018 5 555/747 Colorectal surgery 1.1/6.1 0.51 0.23–1.13 0.10

ICG, indocyanine green; AR, anterior resection; LAR, low anterior resection; CI, confidence interval.