Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 4;377(1851):20210151. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0151

Table 2.

Information-Theoretic Model selection results: boundary patrols. Values in italics indicate variables with non-zero model averaged parameter estimates. Parameters include: the intercept; Elo rank; operational sex ratio; age; age2; patrol participation, periphery visit participation, hunting participation; Dominance, Conscientiousness; the number of free parameters (K); the marginal pseudo R2 for fixed effects; the conditional R2 for fixed and random effects; the difference in Akaike information criterion between the ith model and the best model (Δi); and model weight (wi). Models are arranged in order from best (lowest ΔAICc) to worst (highest ΔAICc). The weight of the model (wi) is the probability that a given model is the best model in a given set of models. Model-averaged parameter estimates (MAP) with upper (97.5%) and lower (2.5%) bounds of the 95% confidence intervals are given in the bottom rows.

model intercept age mating rank adult males in the community hunting participation Dominance Conscientious-ness sighting frequency K marginal R2 conditional R2 Δi wi
hunting −1.52 1.83 0.21 −0.08 2.82 6 0.05 0.08 0.00 0.99
observation frequency −0.73 3.37 3 0.03 0.05 9.18 0.01
total males 0.20 0.08 3 0.03 0.03 54.97 0.00
rank 0.97 0.38 0.13 −0.18 5 0.01 0.02 56.76 0.00
personality 1.28 0.14 −0.22 4 0.00 0.02 56.93 0.00
mating frequency 1.26 2.45 0.13 −0.22 5 0.01 0.02 58.31 0.00
age 1.03 0.00 3 0.00 0.02 58.69 0.00
model-averaged parameter −1.51 0.00 2.45 0.38 0.08 1.83 0.21 −0.08 2.82
2.5% −3.51 −0.02 −3.34 −0.11 0.00 0.77 −0.08 −0.38 1.81
97.5% 0.5 0.02 8.23 0.86 0.16 2.89 0.50 0.23 3.84