Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 1;12(4):e051131. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051131

Table 1.

Characteristics of the studies included in systematic review

Author Study
Design
Country and participants Observation period Intervention description Outcome (measures) Results Quality assessment rating
Åkerstedt et al, 200124 Longitudinal intervention study Sweden, N=63, full-time workers in healthcare service. 36 months Intervention group (N=41): reduced WWH from 39 hrs/week to 30 hrs/week.
Control group (N=22): unchanged working time.
  • General symptoms,

  • neuropsychological symptoms,

  • working life quality,

  • quality of life,

  • physical activity,

  • sleep

Subjective sleep quality (SSQ), mental fatigue and heart/respiratory symptoms, time for social activity, time for family and friends improved significantly more in the experimental group than in the control group. No significant effects for sickness absence or self-rated health. Weak
Wergeland et al, 200322 Longitudinal intervention study Norway and Sweden, N=403.
Workers in nursing homes, home care services and kindergartens
12–22 months Intervention group: reduced DWH to 6 hrs/day.
Reference group: unchanged working time.
  • Musculoskeletal disorders, (shoulder-neck and back pain frequency and work-related physical exhaustion)

  • working life quality

A significant interaction was found for neck-shoulder pain and for exhaustion after work in the intervention group.
No significant effects were observed in the reference group.
Weak
von Thiele Schwarz et al, 200820 Longitudinal intervention study Sweden, N=177 employees from six workplaces at public dental healthcare organisation 12 months PE group: 2.5 hrs/week of physical activity instead of work time.
Reduced work hours group: reduced WWH proportionally to the amount of time worked.
Reference group: unchanged working time.
  • General symptoms,

  • musculoskeletal disorders,

  • working life quality (work-home interference, recovery from work and work ability),

  • physical activity

  • biological markers (blood lipids, neuroendocrine markers, cardiovascular measures)

Physical activity level increased in all three groups but significantly more in PE group. Glucose levels and upperextremity disorders were found to be significantly decreased in the exercise group, while a significant increase in HDL and waist-to-hip ratio was found among those working reduced hours.
Participants working reduced hours also had significantly increased total cholesterol, while no changes in LDL-to-HDL ratio were recorded.
Strong
von Thiele Schwarz et al, 201121 Longitudinal intervention study Sweden, N=177 employees from six workplaces at a public dental healthcare organisation 12 months PE group: 2.5 hrs/week of physical activity instead of work time.
Reduced work hours group: reduced WWH proportionally to the amount of time worked.
Reference group: unchanged working time.
  • On-the-job productivity,

  • working life quality (sickness presenteeism and sickness absenteeism)

  • Objective production levels (administrative records)

Physical activity was significantly associated with an increase in self-rated productivity in terms of increased quantity of work and work-ability and decreased frequency and number of days of sickness absence. No effect was found in the work hours reduction group. In all three groups there was an increase in the number of treated patients per therapist, significantly greater in the reduced work hours group. Strong
Barck-Holst et al, 201718 Longitudinal quasi-experimental trial Sweden, N=204
A total of 125 participants were deemed as per protocol
18 months Intervention group: reduced work hours by 25%.
Reference group: unchanged working time.
  • Neuro-psychological symptoms

  • working life quality (demands, control, social support, instrumental manager support, instrumental coworker support, work intrusion on private life)

  • sleep

The intervention group significantly improved restorative sleep, stress, memory difficulties, negative emotion, sleepiness, fatigue and exhaustion on both work days and weekends. Improved demands, instrumental manager support and work intrusion on private life were observed to be significantly higher in the intervention group. Moderate
Lorentzon 201723 Longitudinal intervention study Sweden, N=124, nurses working in a centre for the elderly 23 months Intervention group: work-time reduction to 6 hours/day.
Reference group: unchanged working time.
  • General symptoms,

  • musculoskeletal disorders,

  • neuro-psychological symptoms (alertness level, perceived fatigue, energy left at home, feeling calm, perceived stress),

  • working life quality (collaboration and personal development, sick leaves),

  • physical activity

  • sleep

Good perceived health and alertness level, satisfactory level of perceived fatigue. Energy left at home, feeling calm, satisfactory levels of stress, average sleep time increased in intervention group.
General symptoms, sleep and musculoskeletal symptoms improved in the intervention group, and dropped in the control group.
Collaboration and personal development improved; improved sense of collaboration between nurses.
Sick leave increased in the intervention group.
No inferential statistics provided.
Weak
Schiller et al, 201719 Longitudinal controlled intervention study Sweden, N=580, workers from 33 workplaces in the public sector 18 months Intervention group: reduced WWH by 25%.
Reference group: unchanged working time.
  • Sleep

  • perceived stress, feeling of worries

On workdays, the intervention group displayed significantly improved SSQ, decreased sleepiness and perceived stress, less feelings of worries and stress at bedtime when work hours were reduced. Also, a significant 23 min extension of sleep duration was detected.
The intervention showed similar positive effects on days off, except for sleep duration.
Strong

HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; PE, physical exercise; WWH, weekly worked hours.