Skip to main content
Annals of Medicine and Surgery logoLink to Annals of Medicine and Surgery
. 2022 Mar 1;75:103422. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103422

Primary adrenal mature teratoma: A rare case report and review of literature

Imane Assarrar a,b, Marouane Harhar b,c, Dounia Zerrouki a,b, Najat Draoui a,b, Achraf Miry b,d, Amal Bennani b,d, Siham Rouf a,b,e, Tijani El Harroudi b,c, Hanane Latrech a,b,e,
PMCID: PMC8977937  PMID: 35386796

Abstract

Introduction

Teratoma is a germ cell tumor, deriving from totipotent cells. Teratomas usually occur in gonads and are rarely extra-gonadal. The adrenal location is exceptional. Only few cases of primary adrenal teratomas have been reported in literature, mainly in young patients.

Case report

We report the case of a 56-year-old female patient who presented with pyrosis, dyspepsia and abdominal pain that was evolving for 5 months. The abdominal computed tomography revealed a voluminous mass of the right adrenal gland and the hormonal evaluation was normal. The patient underwent an open transperitoneal adrenalectomy and the histopathological examination of the specimen confirmed the diagnosis of mature teratoma.

Discussion

Adrenal teratomas are commonly asymptomatic and their diagnosis depends mostly on radiologic findings. Malignant transformation is very rare. Surgical excision is the mainstay of treatment with a good prognosis.

Conclusion

Open surgery should always be considered in large and adhering teratoma tumors of the adrenal gland. Some pathologic features and tumorigenesis of adrenal teratomas are not entirely elucidated, thus the importance of larger studies in order to comprehend this pathological entity.

Keywords: Case report, Teratoma, Retroperitoneal tumor, Adrenal gland tumor, Adrenalectomy

Abbreviations: LC-MS/MS, liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry; CLIA, Chemiluminescence immunoassay; CMIA, chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay; VMA, vanillyl mandelic acid

Highlights

  • The adrenal location of primary adrenal teratomas is exceptional.

  • The preoperative diagnosis is challenging, based mainly on imaging findings.

  • Open surgery should always be considered in large and adhering teratoma tumors of the adrenal gland.

1. Introduction

Teratomas are germ cell tumors deriving from totipotent cells. In adults, these tumors occur regularly in gonads and are rarely extra-gonadal. Retroperitoneal teratomas account for 4% of all primary teratomas and are more common in children, whereas adrenal teratomas are even rarer [1]. Based on the degree of their differentiated tissue, they are classified as mature or immature. Mature teratomas are made of at least 90% of well-differentiated tissues, while immature teratomas comprise at least 10% of immature tissue and are at greater risk for malignant transformation [2]. The preoperative diagnosis is challenging as these tumors can be often mistaken for other adrenal tumors such as adrenal adenomas, myelolipomas or angiomyolipomas [3].

In this paper, we report the case of a mature adrenal teratoma in an adult female patient with a systematic literature review. This case has been reported following the SCARE criteria [4].

2. Case report

A 56-year-old female patient with unremarkable personal and family history presented with right side upper abdominal pain that appeared 5 months before. The physical examination was normal. The abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) revealed a large spherical mass of the right adrenal gland, consisting majorly of fatty component, with minimal soft tissue density and a large calcification, sized 76 × 72 × 80 mm (depth x width x height) (Fig. 1). The tumor was responsible for liver scalloping in the segments I, VI, VII and VIII and was intimately attached to the posterior border of the inferior vena cava (IVC).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Axial image of abdominal CT scan showing a mass of the right adrenal gland (red arrow) with major fatty component and a minimal soft tissue density, including a macrocalcification. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

Routine biological assessment, including liver and kidney function tests and complete blood count, was unremarkable. Adrenal-related hormonal assessment was normal: 24-h urine metanephrine was at 0.27 μmol/24h (NV: 0.20–1.00 μmol/24h, LC-MS/MS) and normetanephrine at 0.31 μmol/24h (NV: 0.40–2.10 μmol/24h, LC-MS/MS). In the supine position, aldosterone was at 169 pmol/l (NV: 83–405 pmol/l, CLIA), renin was at 4.5 mUI/l (NV: 2.8–39.9 mU/l, direct immunometric assay) with an aldosterone-to-renin ratio at 34 (NV < 64). In the upright position, aldosterone was at 461 pmol/l (NV: 208–1000 pmol/l, CLIA), renin was at 39.7 mUI/l (NV: 4.4–46.1 mUI/l, direct immunometric assay) with an aldosterone-to-renin ratio at 12 (NV < 64). Moreover, 24-h urinary free cortisol was normal at 630 ng/24h (43–1760 ng/24h, immunoassay), and morning serum cortisol was at 14ng/ml after 1 mg dexamethasone suppression test (NV < 18 ng/ml, CMIA). These results excluded a functional adrenal tumor. Tumor markers were normal: alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) was at 1.5 ng/ml (NV: 0–7 ng/ml, CMIA), human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) was at 1.99 mUI/ml (NV < 10 mUI/ml, CMIA), CA19-9 was at 5.32 U/ml (NV: 0–33 U/ml, CMIA) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) was at 1.94 ng/ml (NV < 5 ng/ml, CMIA).

Thus, a transperitoneal adrenalectomy under general anesthesia, in the left lateral decubitus position, was performed by the surgical oncology department. Intraoperatively, the tumor was difficult to mobilize as it was intimately adherent to the IVC, the right liver and the right pillar of the diaphragm (Fig. 2). The mass was gently dissected and successfully removed. The postoperative course was uneventful.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

A. Intraoperative image showing the adrenal mass (arrow) intimately adhering to the IVC (star). B. Macroscopic image of the specimen showing a gray well-encapsulated mass. C. Dissection of the mass showing the presence of hair, sebaceous material and bone fragments. D. Microphotography showing presence of a normal squamous epithelium with presence of adnexal elements: sebaceous and sweat glands. HE; 100X. E. Microphotography showing the focal presence of a respiratory epithelium. The lamina propria contains sebaceous glands. HE; 200X.

The postoperative gross examination showed a gray well-encapsulated mass, measuring 8 × 6 × 7 cm and weighing 247g. Upon dissection, the tumor contained hair, sebaceous material and bone fragments. Microscopically, the tumor included sebaceous and sweat glands, respiratory epithelium, cartilage and bone material (Fig. 2). The diagnosis of multitissular mature teratoma was confirmed. Neither immature nor malignant components were identified. Postoperatively, the patient remained well and exhibited no signs of recurrence during 18 months of follow-up.

3. Discussion

Teratomas are germ cell tumors composed of mature tissues arising from more than one germinal layer i.e., ectoderm, mesoderm, and endoderm. Teratomas occurring in early childhood are mostly extra-gonadal, while those occurring in adults are mainly found in the gonads [1]. The retroperitoneal location, particularly in the adrenal gland, is extremely rare accounting for 1–11% of all retroperitoneal primary tumors [2].

For our systematic review of primary adrenal teratomas in adults, we searched for the terms of “adrenal teratoma” in the PubMed database. A total of 289 studies were published between June 1952 and December 2021. We excluded the cases reported in children, review articles, letters, abstracts without full text and irrelevant publications. Out of the remaining studies, we identified 40 cases of primary adrenal teratomas in adults aged more than 16 years reported in 19 publications. We extracted and summarized demographic, clinical, imaging, management and follow-up data in Table 1.

Table 1.

Characteristics of published cases of primary adrenal teratomas in adults.

Case No Author/Year Age Gender Clinical symptoms Maximal diameter (mm) Laterality Solid vs cystic Histologic
Diagnosis
Calcifications Surgery Follow-up (months)
1 [5] Lam et al., 1999 18 F GP 110 L S Yes 7
2 [5] Lam et al., 1999 17 M GP 75 R C MT 6
3 [5] Lam et al., 1999 37 F GP 100 L C MT 8
4 [6] Bedri et al., 2002 57 F AP 80 L C MT Yes
5 [7] Polo et al., 2004 21 F AP 380 L C MT No OA
6 [8] Castillo et al., 2006 61 F IF 80 L S MT LA
7 [9] Rais-Bahrami et al., 2007 33 M IF 50 L C S MT Yes OA
8 [10] Sato et al., 2010 37 M IF 200 L C S MT Yes LA
9 [11] Giordano et al., 2011 62 M IF 47 L C S MT Yes LA
10 [12] Bhatti et al., 2013 22 M FP 108 L C MT Yes
11 [13] Li H et al., 2015 49 M IF 110 R C MT Yes LA 12
12 [14] Li S et al., 2015 21 F 85 R C S MT Yes LA
13 [14] Li S et al., 2015 16 F 90 R C S MT Yes LA
14 [14] Li S et al., 2015 43 F 49 L S MT No LA
15 [14] Li S et al., 2015 49 F 53 L C S MT Yes LA
16 [14] Li S et al., 2015 51 F 24 R LA
17 [15] Nadeem et al., 2015 19 M FP 80 R C S MT Yes OA
18 [16] Bhatia et al., 2016 24 F FP 76 L S MT Yes OA 29
19 [17] Kataoka et al., 2016 32 F IF 51 R C S MT Yes LA 8
20 [18] Kuo et al., 2017 26 M FP 85 R MT Yes OA
21 [18] Kuo et al., 2017 29 F IF 25 L MT Yes LA
22 [18] Kuo et al., 2017 24 F AP 115 L C MT LA
23 [19] Niu et al.,
2017
36 F IF 80 R S MT with adenocarcinoma Yes LA
24 [20] Pandit et al., 2018 16 F AL 120 L C MT Yes LA
25 [21] Ramakant et al., 2018 25 F FP 190 R S C MT Yes OA 12
26 [22] Zhou et al., 2018 69 F IF 100 L S MT Yes OA 12
27 [22] Zhou et al., 2018 29 F IF 25 L MT Yes LA
28 [23] Ban et al., 2019 60 M FP
FP
120
58
L
L
C S
C S
MT Yes
Yes
LA
29 [24] Wang et al., 2019 22 F IF 132
125
L
R
C S MT Yes LA
30 [25] Zhong et al., 2020 59 F FP 106 L C MT Yes OA 124
31 [25] Zhong et al., 2020 54 F AS 102 R S C MT Yes OA 124
32 [25] Zhong et al., 2020 22 F AP 100 R S C MT Yes OA 109
33 [25] Zhong et al., 2020 48 F AS 96 R C MT Yes LA 101
34 [25] Zhong et al., 2020 26 M FP 40 R C MT Yes LA 90
35 [25] Zhong et al., 2020 18 F AP 88 R S C MT Yes LA 88
36 [25] Zhong et al., 2020 55 F AS 140 L S MT Yes OA 69
37 [25] Zhong et al., 2020 28 F AS 45 R S C MT Yes LA 60
38 [25] Zhong et al., 2020 29 F AS 78 R C MT Yes LA 56
39 [25] Zhong et al., 2020 29 F AS 70 L S C MT Yes LA 56
40 [25] Zhong et al., 2020 72 F AS 60 R S MT No OA 55
41 [25] Zhong et al., 2020 28 F AS 90,5 L C MT Yes OA 7
42 [25] Zhong et al., 2020 41 F AS 180 L C MT Yes OA 43
43 [25] Zhong et al., 2020 45 M AS 60,8 L C MT Yes LA 28
44 [3] Cheng He et al., 2020 17 F AS 70 R C MT Yes LA 12
45 [26] Tojal et al., 2020 75 M AS 50,6 L C MT Yes LA 20
46 Our case Assarrar et al., 2021 56 F FP 80 R S MT Yes OA 18

AP, abdominal pain; IF, incidental finding; FP, flank pain; EP, epigastric pain; AL, abdominal lump; AD, abdominal distention; –, not recorded; L, left; R, right; S, solid; C, cystic; MT, mature teratoma; AS Asymptomatic; OA, open adrenalectomy; LA, laparoscopic adrenalectomy.

According to literature, primary adrenal teratomas in adults are extremely rare with only 41 cases reported cases in the 20th century, in patients aged between 16 and 75 years. They can occur in a wide age range, with a peak in the third decade of life and a mean age of 33.2 years, and seem to affect more females than males with a male-female sex-ratio of 0.31 (11 males and 35 females). As regards laterality, 52.2% of the masses occurred in the left adrenal gland, while 46.3% were found in the right side including our case. One case presented with bilateral adrenal teratomas [24].

In terms of clinical presentation, primary adrenal teratomas can be discovered fortuitously (22 cases), or can present with non-specific symptoms like abdominal pain when the diameters become large enough to exert pressure on neighboring organs (19 cases). The average tumor size was 6.23cm. The largest reported mass was sized 38 cm and weighed 10kg [16].

Adrenal teratomas are typically non-functional tumors. In the available data, thirty patients, including our case, have benefited from a preoperative endocrine evaluation that was strictly normal, except one case of a 36-yar-old patient who had abnormal laboratory values of cortisol, adenocroticotropic hormone (ACTH), aldosterone, and vanillyl mandelic acid (VMA) due to a malignant transformation of a mature adrenal teratoma with adenocarcinoma components [19]. Tumor markers, AFP and hCG were tested in 14 patients, with negative results.

Abdominal CT is the gold standard for preoperative diagnosis. However, depending on the composition of the mass, the diagnosis is usually difficult. Classically, these tumors present as well-circumscribed masses with mixed density secondary to the presence of multiple tissue types (i.e., calcification, bone, teeth, soft tissue and fluid components) and a predominant fatty density [27]. Davidson et al. [28] suggested that the presence of a heterogeneous mass containing a well-circumscribed fluid volume, fat-fluid level (created by adipose tissue or sebaceous material) and calcifications were the most characteristic radiologic findings on CT. The presence of major fatty component can mislead the diagnosis as myelolipomas have similar radiologic features. The calcifications can be linear, radial or punctuate. They were found in 33 cases (71.2%), while fat component was identified in 38 cases (82.6%), including our case. Magnetic resonance imaging confers a better identification of soft tissues and has superior tumor staging assessment [27]. Abdominal ultrasound has a small contribution to the diagnosis as it can only differentiate between cystic and solid elements [26].

Our patient underwent open surgery for her large adhering mass. Currently, laparoscopic surgery has become the mainstay of treatment for benign adrenal tumors dethroning open surgery, since it has lower morbidity and allows an earlier recovery with less pain [25]. However, open surgery should be the first choice for large tumors with important adherence, such as the tumor described in our case. In the available literature, all patients underwent surgical excision of the tumor. Depending on the size, 18 patients (39.1%) had open surgery and 28 patients (60.9%) went through laparoscopic surgery (Table 1).

Histopathological examination is the key for conclusive diagnosis of adrenal teratoma. Mature teratomas appear as well-encapsulated tumors, with smooth appearance, mainly cystic and composed by two or three germ layers, usually comprising fully mature elements i.e., sebaceous material, hair, bone and fat components. Immature teratomas include at least 10% of undifferentiated tissue [14,29].

Gatcombe et al. [2] reported that the malignancy rate of retroperitoneal teratomas in adults was significantly higher than in children (26% vs. 7%). In our review data, the diagnosis of mature adrenal teratoma was confirmed in all patients except two cases; a case of a 17-year-old patient who had a malignant teratoma that needed postoperative chemotherapy and a 36-year-old female patient whose diagnosis was a mature adrenal teratoma with adenocarcinoma [19,30]. The criteria for benign teratomas are: the absence of malignant or immature elements in histopathology, the absence of metastasis, normal levels of AFP and hCG and the absence of recurrences during follow-up [13].

The overall prognosis after complete surgical excision of adrenal teratomas is favorable. However, whether the teratoma is mature or immature, a regular post-operative follow-up is mandatory for early identification and management of recurrences and metastases [14]. The follow-up of our patient for 18 months didn't reveal any recurrence or metastasis.

4. Conclusion

Teratomas rarely present as retroperitoneal tumors in adults, particularly in adrenal glands. Their preoperative diagnosis remains difficult and its confirmation depends solely on histopathological examination. Surgical management of mature adrenal teratomas is the mainstay of treatment with an excellent postoperative prognosis. Several clinical and pathologic features of adrenal teratomas are not clearly elucidated. Further studies are necessary in order to comprehend their tumorigenesis and pathologic properties.

Sources of funding

This research was not funded.

Consent

A written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal on request.

Ethical approval

This is a case report that does not require a formal ethical committee approval. Data were anonymously registered in our database. Access to data was approved by the head of the department.

Author contribution

Dr. Imane Assarrar wrote the manuscript.

Dr. Marouane Harhar helped in writing and provided surgical data.

Dr. Dounia Zerrouki helped in writing and literature review.

Dr. Najat Draoui helped in writing and literature review.

Dr. Achraf Miry interpreted and provided pathological data.

Pr. Amal Bennani confirmed the histological diagnosis and revised the final manuscript.

Pr. Siham Rouf helped in writing, supervised the redaction and revised the manuscript.

Pr. Tijani El Harroudi operated the patient and revised the final manuscript.

Pr. Hanane Latrech helped in writing, supervised the redaction, revised and approved the final draft for publication.

All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Registration of research studies

This is not an interventional study. We only reported the patient's findings from our database as a case report.

Guarantor

Professor Hanane Latrech.

Provenance and peer review

Not commissioned, externally peer reviewed.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Footnotes

Appendix A

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103422.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

The following is the Supplementary data to this article:

Multimedia component 1
mmc1.docx (29.8KB, docx)

References

  • 1.Grosfeld J.L., Billmire D.F. Teratomas in infancy and childhood. Curr. Probl. Cancer. 1985;9:1–53. doi: 10.1016/S0147-0272(85)80031-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gatcombe H.G., Assikis V., Kooby D., Johnstone P.A.S. Primary retroperitoneal teratomas: a review of the literature. J. Surg. Oncol. 2004;86:107–113. doi: 10.1002/JSO.20043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.He C., Yang Y., Yang Y., Wang F., Hu J., Zhang J., Yin Y., Zeng L., Zhang T., Liu H. Teratoma of the adrenal gland: clinical experience and literature review. Gland Surg. 2020;9:1056. doi: 10.21037/GS-20-648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Agha R.A., Franchi T., Sohrabi C., Mathew G., Kerwan A., Thoma A., Beamish A.J., Noureldin A., Rao A., Vasudevan B., Challacombe B., Perakath B., Kirshtein B., Ekser B., Pramesh C.S., Laskin D.M., Machado-Aranda D., Miguel D., Pagano D., Millham F.H., Roy G., Kadioglu H., Nixon I.J., Mukhejree I., McCaul J.A., Chi-Yong Ngu J., Albrecht J., Rivas J.G., Raveendran K., Derbyshire L., Ather M.H., Thorat M.A., Valmasoni M., Bashashati M., Chalkoo M., Teo N.Z., Raison N., Muensterer O.J., Bradley P.J., Goel P., Pai P.S., Afifi R.Y., Rosin R.D., Coppola R., Klappenbach R., Wynn R., De Wilde R.L., Surani S., Giordano S., Massarut S., Raja S.G., Basu S., Enam S.A., Manning T.G., Cross T., Karanth V.K., Kasivisvanathan V., Mei Z. The SCARE 2020 guideline: updating consensus surgical CAse REport (SCARE) guidelines. Int. J. Surg. 2020;84:226–230. doi: 10.1016/J.IJSU.2020.10.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lam K., Lo C. Teratoma in the region of adrenal gland: a unique entity masquerading as lipomatous adrenal tumor. Surgery. 1999;126:90–94. doi: 10.1067/msy.1999.98924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bedri S., Erfanian K., Schwaitzberg S., et al. Mature cystic teratoma involving adrenal gland. Endocr. Pathol. 2002;13:59–64. doi: 10.1385/ep:13:1:59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Polo J., Villarejo P., Molina M., et al. Giant mature cystic teratoma of the adrenal region. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2004;183:837–838. doi: 10.2214/ajr.183.3.1830837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Castillo O., Vitagliano G., Villeta M., et al. Laparoscopic resection of adrenal teratoma. J. Soc. Laparoendosc. Surg. 2006;10:522–524. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rais-Bahrami S., Varkarakis I., Lujan G., et al. Primary retroperitoneal teratoma presenting as an adrenal tumor in an adult. Urology. 2007;69:181–185. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.10.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sato F., Mimata H., Mori K. Primary retroperitoneal mature cystic teratoma presenting as an adrenal tumor in an adult. Int. J. Urol. 2010;17 doi: 10.1111/J.1442-2042.2010.02591.X. 817–817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Giordano R., Giraudo G., Forno D., et al. A case of primary retroperitoneal teratoma presenting as an adrenal incidentaloma. J. Endocrinol. Invest. 2011;34:645–646. doi: 10.1007/BF03345398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bhatti A., Al-Hindi H., Azzam A., et al. Mature (benign) cystic retroperitoneal teratoma involving the left adrenal gland in a 22-year-old male: a case report and literature review. Case Rep. Oncol. Med. 2013 doi: 10.1155/2013/610280. 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Li H., Zhao T., Wei Q., Yuan H., Cao D., Shen P., Liu L., Zeng H., Chen N. Laparoscopic resection of a huge mature cystic teratoma of the right adrenal gland through retroperitoneal approach: a case report and literature review. World J. Surg. Oncol. 2015;13 doi: 10.1186/S12957-015-0734-Z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Li S., Li H., Ji Z., et al. Primary adrenal teratoma: clinical characteristics and retroperitoneal laparoscopic resection in five adults. Oncol. Lett. 2015;10:2865–2870. doi: 10.3892/ol.2015.3701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nadeem M., Ather M., Sulaiman M., et al. Looks Can Be Deceiving”: adrenal teratoma causing diagnostic difficulty. Case Rep. Urol. 2015 doi: 10.1155/2015/232591. 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bhatia V., Sharma S., Sood S., Mardi K., Venkat B. Case 231: retroperitoneal adrenal teratoma presenting as trichoptysis. Radiology. 2016;280:317–321. doi: 10.1148/RADIOL.2016140459/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/RADIOL.2016140459.FIG6.JPEG. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kataoka M., Fukushima H., Nakanishi Y., et al. Retroperitoneal teratoma in an adult: a potential pitfall in the differential diagnosis of adrenal myelolipoma. Case Rep. Urol. 2016 doi: 10.1155/2016/5141769. 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kuo E., Sisk A., Yang Z., et al. Adrenal teratoma: a case series and review of the literature. Endocr. Pathol. 2017;28:152–158. doi: 10.1007/s12022-017-9468-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Niu M., Liu A., Zhao Y., Feng L. Malignant transformation of a mature teratoma of the adrenal gland: a rare case report and literature review. Medicine (Baltim.) 2017:96. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pandit N., Awale L., Jaiswal L.S. Giant calcified retroperitoneal teratoma. Indian J. Surg. Oncol. 2018;9:436. doi: 10.1007/S13193-018-0789-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ramakant P., Rana C., Singh K., Mishra A. Primary adrenal teratoma: an unusual tumor – challenges in diagnosis and surgical management. J. Postgrad. Med. 2018;64:112. doi: 10.4103/JPGM.JPGM_588_16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zhou L., Pan X., He T., Lai Y., Li W., Hu Y., Ni L., Yang S., Chen Y., Lai Y. Primary adrenal teratoma: a case series and review of the literature. Mol. Clin. Oncol. 2018;9:437–442. doi: 10.3892/MCO.2018.1687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ban A., Satapara J., Rathod K., Bahri N. Teratoma involving adrenal gland-A case report and review of literature. Indian J. Radiol. Imag. 2019;29:472–476. doi: 10.4103/IJRI.IJRI_452_18/ID/JR_38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wang J., Zhang J., Xiao C., Fan C. Laparoscopic simultaneous resection of bilateral giant primary mature retroperitoneal teratoma of the adrenal region: a case report. Medicine (Baltim.) 2019;98 doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhong W., Ma R., Cheng S., Tian J., Wang H., Wang T., Zhang Z., Li X., Lu J., Ma L., Zhou L. Clinical characteristics and surgical management of adult adrenal teratoma: a 15-year experience and systematic review of the literature. Urology. 2020;135:71–75. doi: 10.1016/J.UROLOGY.2019.05.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tojal A., Santos N., Vicente J., Carrilho N., Casimiro C. Retroperitoneal mature cystic teratoma involving the left adrenal gland in a 75-year-old male: a case report and literature review. J. Surg. Case Rep. 2020;11:1–3. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjaa451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Guo Y.K., Yang Z.G., Li Y., Deng Y.P., Sen Ma E., Min P.Q., Zhang X.C. Uncommon adrenal masses: CT and MRI features with histopathologic correlation. Eur. J. Radiol. 2007;62:359–370. doi: 10.1016/J.EJRAD.2006.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Davidson A.J., Hartman D.S., Goldman S.M. 1989. Mature Teratoma of the Retroperitoneum: Radiologic, Pathologic, and Clinical Correlation; pp. 421–425. Https://Doi.Org/10.1148/Radiology.172.2.2664866. 172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Schmidt D., Kommoss · F. Teratome des Ovars. Pathologe. 2007;28:203–208. doi: 10.1007/s00292-007-0909-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.McMillan A., Horwich A. Malignant teratoma presenting with an adrenal mass. Clin. Radiol. 1987;38:327–328. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(87)80088-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Multimedia component 1
mmc1.docx (29.8KB, docx)

Articles from Annals of Medicine and Surgery are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES