Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 4;377:e066375. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-066375

Table 3.

Certainty of evidence and summary effect estimates assessed by GRADE (grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation) of controlled trials investigating interventions to taper long term opioid treatment for non-cancer chronic pain

Outcome Intervention group
Pain self-management Complementary and alternative medicine Pharmacological and biomedical devices and interventions Opioid replacement treatment Deprescription
Opioid discontinuation (positive effect favours intervention over control)
Very low certainty (RR 2.15 (95% CI 1.02 to 4.53), τ2=0.00, I2=0%); subgroup: pain self-management v no pain self-management Very low certainty (moderate positive effect) Very low certainty (RR 6.07 (95% CI 1.16 to 31.77), τ2=0.00, I2=0%); subgroup: SCS v conventional medical treatment Low certainty (no effect) Low certainty (no effect); subgroup: patient focused
Low certainty (nil or small positive effect); subgroup: other Low certainty (nil or moderate positive effect); subgroup: other Moderate certainty (aOR 1.5 (95% CI 1.0 to 2.1)*); subgroup: prescriber focused
Opioid dose (negative effect favours intervention over control) Moderate certainty (MD −14.31 mg daily OME (95% CI −21.57 to−7.05), τ2=0.00, I2=0%); subgroup: pain self-management v no pain self-management Very low certainty (MD −1.56 mg daily OME (95% CI −19.03 to 15.92), τ2=155.05, I2=69%); subgroup: acupuncture v no acupuncture Low certainty (nil or small negative effect) Very low certainty (no effect) Low certainty (no effect); subgroup: patient focused
Low certainty (small negative effect); subgroup: other Very low certainty (moderate negative effect); subgroup: other Moderate certainty (MD −6.8 (SE 1.6) mg daily OME*); subgroup: prescriber focused
Pain intensity (negative effect favours intervention over control) Low certainty (SMD −0.59 (95% CI −1.02 to −0.16), τ2=0.00, I2=0%); subgroup: pain self-management v no pain self-management Very low certainty (SMD 0.02 (95% CI −0.29 to 0.34), τ2=0.00, I2=0%); subgroup: acupuncture v no acupuncture Low certainty (nil or small negative effect) Very low certainty (no effect) Low certainty (nil or small positive effect); subgroup: patient focused
Low certainty (small negative effect); subgroup: other
Pain related function (negative effect favours intervention over control) Low certainty (SMD –0.27 (95% CI –0.69 to 0.15), τ2=0.00, I2=0%); subgroup: pain self-management v no pain self-management Low certainty (no effect) Low certainty (nil or small negative effect) Very low certainty (no effect) Low certainty (nil or small positive effect) subgroup: patient focused
Low certainty (small negative effect); subgroup: other
Quality of life (positive effect favours intervention over control) Very low certainty (small positive effect) Low certainty (no effect) Low certainty (nil or small positive effect) Very low certainty (no effect); subgroup: patient focused
Withdrawal symptoms (negative effect favours intervention over control) Very low certainty (no effect) Low certainty (no effect) Low certainty (no effect) Low certainty (small positive or negative effect); subgroup: patient focused
Substance use (negative effect favours intervention over control) Low certainty (no effect) Very low certainty (multiple events†) Low certainty (no effect); subgroup: patient focused
Adverse events (negative effect favours intervention over control) Low certainty (1 event†) Low certainty (few minor events†) Low certainty (multiple events†) Low certainty (multiple events†) Low certainty (no effect); subgroup: patient focused

aOR=adjusted odds ratio; MD=mean difference; OME=oral morphine equivalent; RR=risk ratio; SCS=spinal cord stimulation; SE=standard error; SMD=standardised mean difference.

*

Statistics were the findings from one study of 985 participants.

Differences between intervention and control groups on this outcome were not reported in this group of studies.