Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Oral Oncol. 2021 Oct 26;123:105574. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2021.105574

Table 3.

Associations between defect characteristics and PROMs.

PROM Defect Characteristic Median Score
(IQR)
P value
UW-QOL Oropharyngeal component Yes 72 (53 – 78) p = 0.2723
Physical No 63 (52 – 73)
Resection type Oral tongue 48 (36 – 70) p = 0.0025
Composite 68 (59 – 81)
Extent of tongue resection None 78 (64 – 92) p < 0.0001
< 1/3 68 (57 – 76)
1/3–1/2 61 (42 – 68)
> 1/2 40 (32 – 53)
UW-QOL Oropharyngeal component Yes 83 (63 – 91) p = 0.39
Social No 70 (63 – 87)
Resection type Oral tongue 73 (62–83 p = 0.3738
Composite 77 (63 – 89)
Extent of tongue resection None 78 (65 – 88) p = 0.2433
< 1/3 69 (62 – 81)
1/3–1/2 82 (66 – 91)
> 1/2 66 (60 – 73)
EAT-10 Oropharyngeal component Yes 4 (2 – 22) p = 0.3850
No 10 (4 – 24)
Resection type Oral tongue 25 (10 – 32 p = 0.0004
Composite 10 (2 – 18)
Extent of tongue resection None 2 (1 – 7) p < 0.0001
< 1/3 8 (4 – 16)
1/3–1/2 19 (7 – 31)
> 1/2 28 (24 – 33)