TABLE 7.
Bayesian analysis of visual function in RP patients after 2 years of the nutritional supplementation.
| Bayesian analysis at baseline | ES | 95% CrI | Pr of PLC < NUT | ROPE | Pr of PLC > NUT | P-value |
| Visual outcomes (both eyes) | ||||||
| P1 amplitude (Σ Q1–Q4) | −0.180 | −0.365; −0.004 | 0.923 | 0.071 | 0.006 | 0.041 |
| Implicit time-mfERG | −0.350 | −4.790; 4.140 | 0.151 | 0.756 | 0.093 | 0.840 |
| VF | −0.139 | −0.702; 0.417 | 0.465 | 0.396 | 0.137 | 0.601 |
| Retinal thickness (SD-OCT) (Mean R1–R9) | −1.210 | −6.480; 4.110 | 0.037 | 0.961 | 0.003 | 0.305 |
ES, estimate; Crl, credible interval; Pr, probability; RP, patients with retinitis pigmentosa; C, controls; ROPE, region of practical equivalence; mfERG, multifocal electroretinography; VF, visual field; SD-OCT, spectral domain-optical coherence tomography.