Skip to main content
. 2000 Apr;44(4):929–937. doi: 10.1128/aac.44.4.929-937.2000

TABLE 3.

Cytotoxicity profile for 1,6-naphthyridine and 7,8-dihydroisoquinoline representatives

Cell line CC50 (μM)
Controla A1 B1 B2 B3
MRC-5b >3,921 8 90 26 255
HFFb >102 31 >23 26 >28
MA-104c >444  6.2 ± 0.3  93.1 ± 8.5 63.6 ± 1.3 91.8 ± 0.2 
MDCKc >410 17.4 ± 2.5 >282   35 ± 5.1 >344
A549c 125.4 ± 16.5 15.6 ± 3.1 225.6 ± 2.3 95.4 ± 3.1  116 ± 10.2
Hs68d 54.2 ± 4.9  5.9 ± 2.1 175   15 ± 1.6 85
Verod 31.2 ± 2.5 1 >282 20 170
Hs68e >392 >312 >282 >318 >344
Veroe >100 NDg >282 80 344
CEM-SSf >2.0 3 87 24 71
PBMCf >1.1 19 >180 23 255
a

Controls: GCV for MRC-5, HFF, and Hs68 cells; ribavirin for MDCK cells; HPMPA for A549 cells; acyclovir for MA-104 and Vero cells; dideoxycytosine for CEM-SS cells; and zidovudine for PBMC. 

b

Visual assessment on MRC-5 and HFF stationary cells (31, 37) was performed in six separate experiments. On a one to four-plus basis of scoring the cytopathology, no variation around the reported values was noticed. 

c

Neutral red uptake on stationary cells (15, 30). MA-104, MDCK, and A549 cells were observed microscopically for drug-induced morphological changes by using seven concentrations of test compound in duplicate. 

d

Thymidine uptake on exponentially growing Hs68 and Vero cells as described in Materials and Methods. 

e

WST-1 cell proliferating agent on exponentially growing Hs68 and Vero cells as described in Materials and Methods. 

f

XTT cell proliferating agent method (4). Experiments were performed in triplicate. Standard deviation was less than 15%. 

g

ND, not determined.